Hi Chris,
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 7:36 AM Christopher Samuel wrote:
> On 24/09/18 00:46, Raymond Wan wrote:
>
> > Hmm, I'm way out of my comfort zone but I am curious about what
> > happens. Unfortunately, I don't think I'm able to read kernel code, but
> > someone here
> > (https://stackov
On 24/09/18 00:46, Raymond Wan wrote:
Hmm, I'm way out of my comfort zone but I am curious about what
happens. Unfortunately, I don't think I'm able to read kernel code, but
someone here
(https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31946854/how-does-sigstop-work-in-linux-kernel)
seems to suggest
Ray
I'm also on Ubuntu. I'll try the same test, but do it with and without swap
on (e.g. by running the swapoff and swapon commands first). To complicate
things I also don't know if the swapiness level makes a difference.
Thanks
Ashton
On Sun, Sep 23, 2018, 7:48 AM Raymond Wan wrote:
>
> Hi Ch
Hi Chris,
On Sunday, September 23, 2018 09:34 AM, Chris Samuel wrote:
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 4:19:09 PM AEST Raymond Wan wrote:
SLURM's ability to suspend jobs must be storing the state in a
location outside of this 512 GB. So, you're not helping this by
allocating more swap.
I d
