Sorry to see it end this way, but to Dan’s point all the rugs are being pulled
out from under this service. I will continue running my nodes, but it does seem
like the official SKS key server network has reached the end of the road. As of
yesterday, all of the pool DNS records were pulled. If yo
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021, Todd Fleisher wrote:
> This service is deprecated. This means it is no longer maintained, and new
> HKPS certificates will not be issued. Service reliability should not be
> expected.
>
> Update 2021-06-21: Due to even more GDPR takedown requests, the DNS records
> for the
In all honesty, as much as I would like to restore my own key server and
make it available as a public resource I think realistically looking at the
SKS software with objective eyes there are flaws that would have to be
addressed or the same situation would persist. The manner in which the
software
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
So ... should the SKS holdouts (myself included) switch to hockeypuck ?
This service is vital, some version of it should live on.
- --
Dr Everett (Skip) Carter 0x8176163B
s...@taygeta.com
Taygeta Scientific Inc
607 Charles Ave
Seaside CA 93955
83
Hey all,
as far as i know Hagrid doesn't support "peering" like SKS or
Hockeypuck. Regarding the latter one I'm running 3 Keyserver with it.
It's working very well and also support key blacklisting and ignores
huge subkeys. A little downside is only the "heavy" read / write
consumption compared
Yes, I've come to the same conclusion that Hagrid does not at this point in
time have any means of federation or "peering". I don't know enough about
Hockeypuck myself and had only briefly looked at it before in the past. One
of the major issues with the way peering worked with SKS that was keeping
On 22/06/2021 19:28, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021, Todd Fleisher wrote:
This service is deprecated. This means it is no longer maintained, and
new HKPS certificates will not be issued. Service reliability should not be
expected.
Update 2021-06-21: Due to even more GDPR tak
Actually my research into Hagrid appears to indicate that it performs the
functions of HKP and WKS/WKD. The lack of ability to syncrohnize
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 3:52 PM Andrew Gallagher
wrote:
> On 22/06/2021 19:28, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Jun 2021, Todd Fleisher wrote:
> >
>
Actually, my research into Hagrid appears to indicate that it performs the
functions of HKP and WKS/WKD. The lack of ability to synchronize keys being
the biggest issue. The lack of third-party signatures is regrettable as it
does essentially neuter the keys retrieved as far as a web of trust goes.
Andreas Puls dijo [Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:32:50PM +0200]:
> Hey all,
>
> as far as i know Hagrid doesn't support "peering" like SKS or
> Hockeypuck. Regarding the latter one I'm running 3 Keyserver with it.
> It's working very well and also support key blacklisting and ignores
> huge subkeys. A l
Andreas Puls dijo [Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:32:50PM +0200]:
> A new domain must be established into the "world". Maybe Kristian would
> transfer the domain / software to one of us. So we could run it on our own.
I agree, having a well established name behind helps. Furthermore,
sks-keyservers.net i
Hi Gunnar,
> Hagrid is IMO a no-go: in order to solve the greatest shortcomings of
> SKS, it drops one of OpenPGP's greatest features: the Web of
> Trust. Yes, for many, the WoT is an anachronistic holdout... But many
> among us still believe in it.
>
> (...)
>
> (For full disclosure: I recently j
12 matches
Mail list logo
