On 23/06/2021 18:30, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Well, for people who have been running SKS lately -- Is dealing with
GDPR requests something you have to deal with often on an ongoing
basis? I cannot answer, as I shut down my server about two years ago
(and neither my server nor myself are in Europe).
I
Wiktor Kwapisiewicz dijo [Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 08:29:04AM +0200]:
> > (For full disclosure: I recently joined a PhD program, and my study
> > subject is how to keep the decentralized properties of the WoT network
> > while at the same time being able to counter the attacks we have seen
> > on it).
Andrew Gallagher dijo [Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 10:12:14AM +0100]:
> Making sks-keyservers.net point to somewhere that still works has merit. I
> would be cautious about taking it on though, as whoever owns it will inherit
> Kristian's GDPR problems. You would need to be prepared to respond to RTBF
> r
On 23/06/2021 10:36, Gabor Kiss wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2021, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
Actually sks-keyservers.net (or its successor) is just a web page that
shows statistics about key servers. That should not public at all
so it would not attract any GDPR complaints.
In the context of this threa
On Wed, 23 Jun 2021, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> Making sks-keyservers.net point to somewhere that still works has merit. I
> would be cautious about taking it on though, as whoever owns it will inherit
> Kristian's GDPR problems. You would need to be prepared to respond to RTBF
> requests in a time
On 23/06/2021 06:27, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Andreas Puls dijo [Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:32:50PM +0200]:
A new domain must be established into the "world". Maybe Kristian would
transfer the domain / software to one of us. So we could run it on our
own.
I agree, having a well established name behin
Hi Gunnar,
> Hagrid is IMO a no-go: in order to solve the greatest shortcomings of
> SKS, it drops one of OpenPGP's greatest features: the Web of
> Trust. Yes, for many, the WoT is an anachronistic holdout... But many
> among us still believe in it.
>
> (...)
>
> (For full disclosure: I recently j
Andreas Puls dijo [Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:32:50PM +0200]:
> A new domain must be established into the "world". Maybe Kristian would
> transfer the domain / software to one of us. So we could run it on our own.
I agree, having a well established name behind helps. Furthermore,
sks-keyservers.net i
Andreas Puls dijo [Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:32:50PM +0200]:
> Hey all,
>
> as far as i know Hagrid doesn't support "peering" like SKS or
> Hockeypuck. Regarding the latter one I'm running 3 Keyserver with it.
> It's working very well and also support key blacklisting and ignores
> huge subkeys. A l
Actually, my research into Hagrid appears to indicate that it performs the
functions of HKP and WKS/WKD. The lack of ability to synchronize keys being
the biggest issue. The lack of third-party signatures is regrettable as it
does essentially neuter the keys retrieved as far as a web of trust goes.
Actually my research into Hagrid appears to indicate that it performs the
functions of HKP and WKS/WKD. The lack of ability to syncrohnize
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 3:52 PM Andrew Gallagher
wrote:
> On 22/06/2021 19:28, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Jun 2021, Todd Fleisher wrote:
> >
>
On 22/06/2021 19:28, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021, Todd Fleisher wrote:
This service is deprecated. This means it is no longer maintained, and
new HKPS certificates will not be issued. Service reliability should not be
expected.
Update 2021-06-21: Due to even more GDPR tak
Yes, I've come to the same conclusion that Hagrid does not at this point in
time have any means of federation or "peering". I don't know enough about
Hockeypuck myself and had only briefly looked at it before in the past. One
of the major issues with the way peering worked with SKS that was keeping
Hey all,
as far as i know Hagrid doesn't support "peering" like SKS or
Hockeypuck. Regarding the latter one I'm running 3 Keyserver with it.
It's working very well and also support key blacklisting and ignores
huge subkeys. A little downside is only the "heavy" read / write
consumption compared
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
So ... should the SKS holdouts (myself included) switch to hockeypuck ?
This service is vital, some version of it should live on.
- --
Dr Everett (Skip) Carter 0x8176163B
s...@taygeta.com
Taygeta Scientific Inc
607 Charles Ave
Seaside CA 93955
83
In all honesty, as much as I would like to restore my own key server and
make it available as a public resource I think realistically looking at the
SKS software with objective eyes there are flaws that would have to be
addressed or the same situation would persist. The manner in which the
software
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021, Todd Fleisher wrote:
> This service is deprecated. This means it is no longer maintained, and new
> HKPS certificates will not be issued. Service reliability should not be
> expected.
>
> Update 2021-06-21: Due to even more GDPR takedown requests, the DNS records
> for the
Sorry to see it end this way, but to Dan’s point all the rugs are being pulled
out from under this service. I will continue running my nodes, but it does seem
like the official SKS key server network has reached the end of the road. As of
yesterday, all of the pool DNS records were pulled. If yo
18 matches
Mail list logo
