Hi Robert,
You may want to consider starting over once more after re-loading from a fresh
key dump. Your server’s status page shows a total of 5,615,275, which is a
delta of ~508,000 keys against the pool’s current mean. Having to process so
many keys via the reconciliation process may put a str
Hey Robbert,
Am 06.04.2021 um 18:53 schrieb Robbert Müller:
On 2021-04-05 17:25, Andreas Puls wrote:
Hi all,
Am 05.04.2021 um 14:00 schrieb Robbert Müller:
On 2021-04-05 07:46, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
I've just noticed that key diff of ALL current 26 pool members is
negative.
Meanwhile ke
On 2021-04-05 17:25, Andreas Puls wrote:
Hi all,
Am 05.04.2021 um 14:00 schrieb Robbert Müller:
On 2021-04-05 07:46, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
I've just noticed that key diff of ALL current 26 pool members is
negative.
Meanwhile keyserver.snt.utwente.nl is dropped from the pool
however it see
Hi all,
Am 05.04.2021 um 14:00 schrieb Robbert Müller:
On 2021-04-05 07:46, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
I've just noticed that key diff of ALL current 26 pool members is
negative.
Meanwhile keyserver.snt.utwente.nl is dropped from the pool
however it seems to be absolute healthy. Except its key
On 2021-04-05 07:46, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
I've just noticed that key diff of ALL current 26 pool members is
negative.
Meanwhile keyserver.snt.utwente.nl is dropped from the pool
however it seems to be absolute healthy. Except its key diff: 73432.
I guess this this node got an attack-like
Gabor, all,
the numbers are positive again, but the anomaly still persists (UTwente
73k ahead of the active keyservers). It seems that from the active set,
only Andreas Puls and escomposlinux are being peered with. I hope the
operators of these three nodes can have a look at their peering and the
