Re: [Sks-devel] [patch] Clocks and VMs

2012-07-09 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2012-07-09 at 02:55 -0500, John Clizbe wrote: > Yes, Phil. Your patch seems to have solved the clocking issue also on Windows. Wiki "Peering" page update accordingly. Thanks folks, feedback appreciated. :) -Phil ___ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-deve

Re: [Sks-devel] [patch] Clocks and VMs

2012-07-09 Thread John Clizbe
John Clizbe wrote: > Phil Pennock wrote: >> >> On 2012-05-31 at 11:51 -0500, John Clizbe wrote: >>> I'm looking forward to trying out this patch on Windows >> >> Were you able to do so? Did this make SKS tenable on Windows? > > Stymied by a linking error. Working on some features Kristian and I

Re: [Sks-devel] [patch] Clocks and VMs

2012-07-07 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 2012-07-07 04:32, Phil Pennock wrote: > On 2012-06-02 at 16:47 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> FYI my keyservers keys.kfwebs.net, keys2.kfwebs.net and >> keys4.kfwebs.net are now all running revision 3036472215d4 [0] that >> has this patch included (included since 4799066ee85f[1]) >> >> I

Re: [Sks-devel] [patch] Clocks and VMs

2012-07-06 Thread John Clizbe
Phil Pennock wrote: > > On 2012-05-31 at 11:51 -0500, John Clizbe wrote: >> I'm looking forward to trying out this patch on Windows > > Were you able to do so? Did this make SKS tenable on Windows? Stymied by a linking error. Working on some features Kristian and I have discussed. I'll beat on

Re: [Sks-devel] [patch] Clocks and VMs

2012-07-06 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2012-06-02 at 16:47 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > FYI my keyservers keys.kfwebs.net, keys2.kfwebs.net and > keys4.kfwebs.net are now all running revision 3036472215d4 [0] that > has this patch included (included since 4799066ee85f[1]) > > I changed the clocksource on the dev server keys

Re: [Sks-devel] [patch] Clocks and VMs

2012-06-02 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2012-05-30 10:57, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 2012-05-30 06:11, Phil Pennock wrote: >> I do not run with SKS in a VM and have never experienced the >> clock problem, so can't test if the attached patch resolves any >> problems. I can confirm

Re: [Sks-devel] [patch] Clocks and VMs

2012-05-31 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2012-05-31 18:51, John Clizbe wrote: > Phil Pennock wrote: >> I do not run with SKS in a VM and have never experienced the >> clock problem, so can't test if the attached patch resolves any >> problems. I can confirm that I can receive a key from

Re: [Sks-devel] [patch] Clocks and VMs

2012-05-31 Thread John Clizbe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1,SHA256 Phil Pennock wrote: > I do not run with SKS in a VM and have never experienced the clock > problem, so can't test if the attached patch resolves any problems. I > can confirm that I can receive a key from a peer with this code applied. > So it'

Re: [Sks-devel] [patch] Clocks and VMs

2012-05-30 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2012-05-30 06:11, Phil Pennock wrote: > I do not run with SKS in a VM and have never experienced the clock > problem, so can't test if the attached patch resolves any problems. > I can confirm that I can receive a key from a peer with this code >

[Sks-devel] [patch] Clocks and VMs

2012-05-29 Thread Phil Pennock
I do not run with SKS in a VM and have never experienced the clock problem, so can't test if the attached patch resolves any problems. I can confirm that I can receive a key from a peer with this code applied. So it's not immediately bad. Can someone who can reproduce the timing problems try this