-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 2012-06-25 at 15:38 +0100, Andy Ruddock wrote:
> If the version number requirements for being in the keyserver pool is
> greater than that provided in the repositories then the package may just
> as well not be in the repositories at all.
No,
On 2012-06-26 23:44, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 06/25/2012 10:15 PM, John Clizbe wrote:
> Is it possible to downgrade a bdb installation? or would i need to
> rebuild the db from a keydump to test this approach?
Hi Daniel,
iirc the same procedure apply as for upgrading, as you remove the
en
On 2012-06-26 21:43, John Clizbe wrote:
> How about another color for "Supports port 80, but not in p80 pool"?
>
Thanks for the heads up. It was trying to access port 80 on
sks.keyservers.net, since this is included in the membership file of
some of your peers, but doesn't respond to port 80. I go
On 06/25/2012 10:15 PM, John Clizbe wrote:
> Christoph Egger wrote:
>> You could also continue using the 4.6 for the 1.1.3 backport also in use
>> by 1.1.1 removing the need for one of the upgrades. This shouldn't be
>> much trouble on the backports package side. I was nearly doing so for my
>> loc
On 2012-06-26 23:31, Johan van Selst wrote:
> Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> Actually, thinking twise, this still won't work, as gnupg as far as I
>> know don't provide a Host header... So the server should still be marked
>> as red in the current setup...
> I am pretty sure that gnupg does provid
Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> Actually, thinking twise, this still won't work, as gnupg as far as I
> know don't provide a Host header... So the server should still be marked
> as red in the current setup...
I am pretty sure that gnupg does provide a host header. When I run
gpg --keyserver hkp:/
On 2012-06-26 22:52, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 2012-06-26 22:48, Johan van Selst wrote:
>> I have updated the configuration, so that requests for the hostname
>> p80.pool.sks-keyservers.net (and in fact *.sks-keyservers.net) now
>> show the same page as http://keyserver.stack.nl/. From now
On 2012-06-26 22:48, Johan van Selst wrote:
>
> I have updated the configuration, so that requests for the hostname
> p80.pool.sks-keyservers.net (and in fact *.sks-keyservers.net) now
> show the same page as http://keyserver.stack.nl/. From now on, requests
> for http://p80.pool.sks-keyservers.net
Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 2012-06-26 20:49, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
> > Just for curiosity I entered URL http://p80.pool.sks-keyservers.net:80
> > in my browser as written on page
> > http://sks-keyservers.net/overview-of-pools.php.
> > I get to page http://mud.stack.nl.
> > That is quit
Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 2012-06-26 20:49, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
>> Dear Johan,
>>
>> Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> ...
>> Just for curiosity I entered URL http://p80.pool.sks-keyservers.net:80
>> in my browser as written on page
>> http://sks-keyservers.net/overview-of-pools.php.
>>
On 2012-06-26 20:49, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
> Dear Johan,
>
> Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
...
> Just for curiosity I entered URL http://p80.pool.sks-keyservers.net:80
> in my browser as written on page
> http://sks-keyservers.net/overview-of-pools.php.
> I get to page http://mud.stack.nl.
> Th
Dear Johan,
Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> Port 80 in the status page is showing a valid inclusion in the p80
> sub-pool[1]. The primary purpose of this is to facilitate key lookups
> also for users that are behind, usually, corporate firewalls blocking
> port 11371. As such this pool will be used
On 2012-06-26 07:49, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
> Dear Kristian,
>
> What does column "Port 80" mean on page
> http://sks-keyservers.net/status/ ?
> This cell is red in line "11 keys.niif.hu" however my server _has_
> appropriate web page at http://keys.niif.hu:80 .
Hi,
I didn't realize that you
13 matches
Mail list logo
