-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 2012-05-26 at 17:35 -0700, David Benfell wrote:
> Just for my own idle curiousity, if the complaint about google code's
> hosting is that its pull request architecture is inferior, wouldn't
> that be a criticism of mercurial itself?
Since we'r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/26/2012 06:37 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>
> On May 26, 2012, at 8:35 PM, David Benfell wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 05/26/2012 05:12 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>>>
>>> Given that (I believe) the source co
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 09:37:49PM -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> On May 26, 2012, at 8:35 PM, David Benfell wrote:
> > On 05/26/2012 05:12 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> >> Given that (I believe) the source code to sks is already stored in
> >> a mercurial repository, it would make sense to use a me
On May 26, 2012, at 8:35 PM, David Benfell wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/26/2012 05:12 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>>
>> Given that (I believe) the source code to sks is already stored in
>> a mercurial repository, it would make sense to use a mercurial
>> ho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/26/2012 05:12 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>
> Given that (I believe) the source code to sks is already stored in
> a mercurial repository, it would make sense to use a mercurial
> hosting service.
>
Just for my own idle curiousity, if the comp
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 11:05:19PM +0200, Jan Kesten wrote:
> Am 26.05.2012 um 21:35 schrieb "C.J. Adams-Collier" :
> > On May 26, 2012, at 9:49 AM, Yaron Minsky wrote:
> >> I'd like to consider migrating sks to bitbucket. Now that development has
> >> been picking up, with multiple people propo
Bitbucket is GIT ;-)
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Am 26.05.2012 um 21:35 schrieb "C.J. Adams-Collier" :
> No objection aside from never having heard of the bitbucket revision control
> system. Any reason you're not considering something git-based?
>
> Sent from my PDP-11
>
> On May 26, 2012, a
No objection aside from never having heard of the bitbucket revision control
system. Any reason you're not considering something git-based?
Sent from my PDP-11
On May 26, 2012, at 9:49 AM, Yaron Minsky wrote:
> I'd like to consider migrating sks to bitbucket. Now that development has
> been
I'd like to consider migrating sks to bitbucket. Now that development has
been picking up, with multiple people proposing patches, I've come to think
that bitbucket's pull request infrastructure is sufficiently better than
google code to be worth the migration costs. I think the main pain is in
r
