2010/7/23 Mats Karlsson :
> Look at the original question "Could anyone suggest any SIP blogs or
> websites, where I can learn more on SIP."
You are right. However voip-info.org seems to me too much focused on
Asterisk stuff (predictive dialers and anti-cool stuff like that).
_
Look at the original question "Could anyone suggest any SIP blogs or
websites, where I can learn more on SIP."
/Mats
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 15:17, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2010/7/23 Mats Karlsson :
> > http://voip-info.org
>
> I don't think that is a blog ;)
>
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
>
Hi, we have the following design requirement. We need to have a 'home network'
which acts as end user agent temporarily for some mobile user agents. The home
network will register for these user agents with a voip service provider.
Incoming calls will be routed to the 'home network' . The mobil
2010/7/23 Mats Karlsson :
> http://voip-info.org
I don't think that is a blog ;)
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
http://voip-info.org
Kind regards
Mats
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:59, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2010/7/23 Seshagiri Kondaveti :
> > Could anyone suggest any SIP blogs or websites, where I can learn more on
> SIP.
>
> http://blog.tekelec.com/
>
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
>
>
> _
And for completeness in case someone's CANCEL or non-2xx-ACK is actually larger
than the related INVITE, section 9.1 requires the CANCEL transport to match the
related INVITE and section 17.1.1.2 requires the non-2xx-ACK transport to match
the related INVITE.
> -Original Message-
> From
NO, its not valid for responses. For sending responses, same protocol must
be used.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 4:40 PM, hanifa.mohammed <
hanifa.moham...@globaledgesoft.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is the below requirement frm RFC3261 applicable for response also? If yes,
> and if the VIA
> of the res
The requirement is only for requests.
> -Original Message-
> From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-
> implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of
> hanifa.mohammed
> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 7:10 AM
> To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> S
Hi all,
Is the below requirement frm RFC3261 applicable for response also? If yes, and
if the VIA
of the response is changed to TCP where as the request has UDP, wont there
be any side effect, while processing this response by the UAC or Proxy Client
txn?
Pl clarify.
"If a request is within
>
> Could anyone suggest any SIP blogs or websites, where I can learn more
> on SIP.
>
You may want to look at http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/SIP
Regards,
Ritul Sonania
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Sesh
>
>
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
confidential an
2010/7/23 Seshagiri Kondaveti :
> Could anyone suggest any SIP blogs or websites, where I can learn more on SIP.
http://blog.tekelec.com/
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs
Try www.tech-invite.com
Regards,
Manjunath
-Original Message-
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Seshagiri
Kondaveti
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 12:39 PM
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Sub
12 matches
Mail list logo
