Re: [SGE-discuss] Making a new queue on the fly

2016-03-19 Thread Jackson, Gary L.
hat is the best way to go about doing that without disrupting existing jobs? I understand that this will reduce the overall utilization of the cluster. -- Gary Jackson On 3/16/16, 6:21 PM, "Dave Love,,," wrote: >"Jackson, Gary L." writes: > >> I've paint

[SGE-discuss] Making a new queue on the fly

2016-03-19 Thread Jackson, Gary L.
I've painted myself in to a corner with all.q. Now I have many long-running jobs in that queue and no way to run shorter testing and debugging jobs. How do I carve a separate queue out of my current resources without disrupting either running or currently queued jobs? Existing jobs currently ru

Re: [SGE-discuss] submitting an LS-DYNA job through SGE

2016-08-08 Thread Jackson, Gary L.
This is may be what's messing you up: export PATH=/ansys_inc/v170/ansys This sets your path to that directory exclusively, which means all sorts of things aren't going to work. You probably want this instead: export PATH=/ansys_inc/v170/ansys:$PATH However, since you're not using ANSYS, you

[SGE-discuss] Mixing shared memory parallel and serial jobs

2017-09-13 Thread Jackson, Gary L.
I’d like to run multithreaded jobs on a cluster that has previously been used exclusively for serial jobs. The problem is that serial jobs are bypassing the parallel jobs despite the parallel jobs having higher priority. Since an entire node never comes free, a parallel job will never run. How

Re: [SGE-discuss] Mixing shared memory parallel and serial jobs

2017-09-14 Thread Jackson, Gary L.
purpose of this is to reduce turnaround time on the parallel jobs at the expense of delaying serial jobs. -- Gary Jackson On 9/13/17, 4:44 PM, "Reuti" wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Am 13.09.2017 um 19:15 schrieb Jacks

Re: [SGE-discuss] Mixing shared memory parallel and serial jobs

2017-09-14 Thread Jackson, Gary L.
come in, I want them to run before any serial jobs with lower priority. -- Gary Jackson On 9/14/17, 10:07 AM, "Reuti" wrote: Hi, Maybe I don't get it in the right way: > Am 14.09.2017 um 15:41 schrieb Jackson, Gary L. : > > > Tha