Re: [SGE-discuss] Qmaster unresponsive, process status "disk sleep"

2017-06-29 Thread juanesteban.jime...@mdc-berlin.de
It’s not the NFS traffic, that is fairly minimal, most of our storage traffic goes to a DDN GPFS cluster. The 139k jobs were not array jobs. The user refuses to do the work to make them array jobs because he thinks snakemake makes it easier for him to handle dependencies with DRMAA and regular

Re: [SGE-discuss] Qmaster unresponsive, process status "disk sleep"

2017-06-29 Thread Mark Dixon
On Tue, 27 Jun 2017, juanesteban.jime...@mdc-berlin.de wrote: Never mind. One of my users submitted a job with 139k subjobs. ... Hi, I don't think I have all the messages from this thread for some reason. No doubt I'm going to repeat things someone else has suggested - apologies in advance