Re: Removing ServiceMix build on continuum

2007-02-27 Thread Terry Cox
I think it's a good plan to have a continuous build system on the snapshot versions of each branch, but somebody on the team needs access to resolve issues like this and we should make sure that the notification system is configured to generate a smaller volume of warning messages. -- Terry C

Re: Removing ServiceMix build on continuum

2007-02-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Agreed. One is running at http://ci.logicblaze.com:8085/ and there is still work to configure it as tests seems to fail (not sure why yet). Notification volume is much lower and is sent to servicemix-commits list. On 2/27/07, Terry Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think it's a good plan to have

Re: [jira] Getting "java.lang.IllegalStateException: component is not owner" Exception

2007-02-27 Thread Juergen Mayrbaeurl
Are you sure you're getting a InOut MessageExchange that's active. I'm not sure but I think that the IllegalStateException comes from sending a response for an inactive MessageExchange. Kind regards Juergen Keertikar wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've written a simple application for publishing a me

Re: [jira] Getting "java.lang.IllegalStateException: component is not owner" Exception

2007-02-27 Thread Keertikar
Yes Juergen, I've put a check to process the message only if the exchange is active and since this block is skipped, so, this makes sure that exchange is Active. I've printed the status on the console it's showing active. But still the same exception. Juergen Mayrbaeurl wrote: > > Are you sure

Re: [jira] Getting "java.lang.IllegalStateException: component is not owner" Exception

2007-02-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet
This exception is thrown when a component modify an exchange while it is not the owner of the exchange. The common cause is that you send the exchange back and modify it after that. On 2/27/07, Keertikar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes Juergen, I've put a check to process the message only if the