I tried. Increasing "maxInactivityDuration" or setting it to 0 changes
nothing. What does the consumer with the message do? Could there be problems
if I will continue using my own consumer?
Greets Goldi
Greets Goldi
goldi wrote:
>
> Ok I will try.
>
> gnodet wrote:
>>
>> Maybe increasing or
Ok I will try.
gnodet wrote:
>
> Maybe increasing or disabling the inactivity timeout may help.
> See http://activemq.apache.org/configuring-wire-formats.html
>
> On 7/2/07, goldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> It has a consumer (can see it in the JMX-Console) but this does consume
>> the
>>
Maybe increasing or disabling the inactivity timeout may help.
See http://activemq.apache.org/configuring-wire-formats.html
On 7/2/07, goldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It has a consumer (can see it in the JMX-Console) but this does consume the
messages for just a amount of time, then it stops c
It has a consumer (can see it in the JMX-Console) but this does consume the
messages for just a amount of time, then it stops consuming messages (but
its still visible on JMX).
Greets Goldi
gnodet wrote:
>
> This queue should have a consumer.
> It is created when the JCA flow is started.
>
>
This queue should have a consumer.
It is created when the JCA flow is started.
On 7/2/07, goldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everybody,
last week I made this post:
http://www.nabble.com/JCA-Flow-Queue%21-t3987283s12049.html
Nobody answered until now. Has nobody else this problem? I'm now us
...post a bug...
-Original Message-
From: goldi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 3:24 PM
To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: JCA-Flow Queue!
Hi everybody,
last week I made this post:
http://www.nabble.com/JCA-Flow-Queue%21-t3987283s12049.html
Nobody
