e to use a
RemoteServiceMixClient than to try to get it off the remote JNDI
context.
Tim.
-Original Message-
From: Guillaume Nodet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 11:22 AM
To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: JNDI factories to provide access to the JBI bu
On 7/25/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/25/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems that remoting a jmx client is not so easy.
> All classes involved must be serializable or mbeans i think.
> And this is not the case at all (the client has a pointer to the
con
On 7/25/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It seems that remoting a jmx client is not so easy.
All classes involved must be serializable or mbeans i think.
And this is not the case at all (the client has a pointer to the container,
the DefaultDestination has a pointer to the client, e
It seems that remoting a jmx client is not so easy.
All classes involved must be serializable or mbeans i think.
And this is not the case at all (the client has a pointer to the container,
the DefaultDestination has a pointer to the client, etc..)
So if we want to go that way, we have to provide w
