I have just checked in a fix to the root pom to exclude this dependency
from xfire-all.
On 8/1/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As a workaround, you can copy the jar from
http://repo.mergere.com/maven2/stax/stax-api/1.0/stax-api-1.0.jar
to
~/.m2/java/xml/jsr173/1.0
I will l
will do :)
P
On 8/1/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As a workaround, you can copy the jar from
http://repo.mergere.com/maven2/stax/stax-api/1.0/stax-api-1.0.jar
to
~/.m2/java/xml/jsr173/1.0
I will look at the problem now.
On 8/1/06, Philip Dodds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
As a workaround, you can copy the jar from
http://repo.mergere.com/maven2/stax/stax-api/1.0/stax-api-1.0.jar
to
~/.m2/java/xml/jsr173/1.0
I will look at the problem now.
On 8/1/06, Philip Dodds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Great! Did you have any luck on the jsr171 dependency?
P
On 8/1/06
Great! Did you have any luck on the jsr171 dependency?
P
On 8/1/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have just added some profiles to the build system.
They can be activated using
mvn -Dprofile=name
where name can be
container => servicemix-services, servicemix-jbi, service
I have just added some profiles to the build system.
They can be activated using
mvn -Dprofile=name
where name can be
container => servicemix-services, servicemix-jbi, servicemix-core
tooling => tooling
components => beanflow, components, common, soap, bpe, ...
assembly => samples,
It seems the problem is tougher that I initially though.
I had forgot that the maven plugin needs servicemix-core to build.
You may need to do:
cd servicemix-jbi
mvn install
mvn -Dmaven.test.skip=true install
mvn install
cd ../servicemix/servicemix-core
mvn -Dmaven.test.skip=true
I downloaded the latest servicemix source from svn, using maven 2.0.4 I then
did a mvn -N install in the main directory with no errors, I then went into
tooling and did a mvn install and got the following error, anybody have an
idea why its not finding the class?
[WARNING] Goal prefix is: jbi; Ma
attribute dumpStats is ignored and Stats.csv not created / filled
-
Key: SM-507
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-507
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Bug
Somehow the XSDs got detached ;-)
- Original Message -
From: "Soumadeep-Infravio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ;
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 7:53 PM
Subject: BAM-Config file handling
Guillaume/All,
Currently, I am handling the config file for the BAM component using
XMLBeans/XSD. We
Guillaume/All,
Currently, I am handling the config file for the BAM component using
XMLBeans/XSD. We can think of some cool way of dealing with it later... Hope
that's Ok with everyone.
All the three XSDs/ sample xmls are attached - global-config, Bam and
Actions...Do take a look ...
Thank
Sounds good :)
P
On 8/1/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/1/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/1/06, Philip Dodds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Probably need to modify the GenerateServiceUnitMojo so that it
contains
> > logic similar to teh Generat
On 8/1/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/1/06, Philip Dodds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Probably need to modify the GenerateServiceUnitMojo so that it contains
> logic similar to teh GenerateComponentMojo. Though we'll need to filter
> out
> the jbi-component so it does en
On 8/1/06, Philip Dodds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Probably need to modify the GenerateServiceUnitMojo so that it contains
logic similar to teh GenerateComponentMojo. Though we'll need to filter
out
the jbi-component so it does end up bundled.
I can take a look now if you like
That would be
Terry,
What sort of dependency issues are you considering within the SU? problems
with the dependency to the component that it is deploying to?
P
On 8/1/06, Terry Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just seen a problem though.
Far from me to say "I told you so" but...
This is causing us
On 8/1/06, Terry Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just seen a problem though.
Far from me to say "I told you so" but...
Did you ? I missed that, you should talk louder ;)
This is causing us some problems too. It also raises the issue of the
build resolving or flagging dependency issu
I've just seen a problem though.
Far from me to say "I told you so" but...
This is causing us some problems too. It also raises the issue of the
build resolving or flagging dependency issues within SUs, which is
likely to become a problem in the lifecycle of richly featured
applications usi
Probably need to modify the GenerateServiceUnitMojo so that it contains
logic similar to teh GenerateComponentMojo. Though we'll need to filter out
the jbi-component so it does end up bundled.
I can take a look now if you like
P
On 8/1/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've just
Do not pay attention to the warnings ;)
You will find the distribution in ./apache-servicemix/target
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 8/1/06, emicalc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have followed the process described at
http://servicemix.goopen.org/site/building.html; at the end of the process
I
o
I've just seen a problem though.
I though the maven-jbi-plugin would embed jar dependencies in the service
unit, but it does not seem to be the case.
Let's say I have a multiproject build containing a jar, a SU and a SA.
If the code inside the SU depends on the jar, I would want the jbi plugin to
Sounds great!
P
On 8/1/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Based on some earlier discussions, I will start to refactor some of the
samples
that use standard JBI components to use the maven jbi plugin instead of an
ant
based build file.
This will allow:
* testing the samples as pa
Based on some earlier discussions, I will start to refactor some of the
samples
that use standard JBI components to use the maven jbi plugin instead of an
ant
based build file.
This will allow:
* testing the samples as part of the build
* demonstrate the use of the jbi plugin
Note that the sa
I have followed the process described at
http://servicemix.goopen.org/site/building.html; at the end of the process I
obtain the next message:
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] ServiceMix
Great! :)
P
On 8/1/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Coolio. Hopefully we can get a new XBean release out soon with the bug
fixes along with a new jencks (I've been xbean-ifying it all along
with improving the m2 build).
On 8/1/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FYI
23 matches
Mail list logo
