RE: JNDI factories to provide access to the JBI bus

2006-07-25 Thread Timothy High
One more note regarding JMX vs. JNDI (and remoting the context): I already tried to register the JBIContainer on the JNDI context, and failed for the obvious reason that it's not serializable. While using the JNDI context can be nice from the perspective of having a uniform registry for all servic

Re: Bug in StaxSource class

2006-07-25 Thread Holger
Ok, i raised a JIRA #SM-498 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Bug-in-StaxSource-class-tf1998365.html#a5487080 Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev forum at Nabble.com.

[jira] Created: (SM-498) StaxSource: Bug in parse() method for character streams

2006-07-25 Thread Holger Bethke (JIRA)
StaxSource: Bug in parse() method for character streams --- Key: SM-498 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-498 Project: ServiceMix Issue Type: Bug Components: servi

Re: JNDI factories to provide access to the JBI bus

2006-07-25 Thread Guillaume Nodet
On 7/25/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/25/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems that remoting a jmx client is not so easy. > All classes involved must be serializable or mbeans i think. > And this is not the case at all (the client has a pointer to the con

Re: JNDI factories to provide access to the JBI bus

2006-07-25 Thread James Strachan
On 7/25/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It seems that remoting a jmx client is not so easy. All classes involved must be serializable or mbeans i think. And this is not the case at all (the client has a pointer to the container, the DefaultDestination has a pointer to the client, e

Re: JNDI factories to provide access to the JBI bus

2006-07-25 Thread Guillaume Nodet
It seems that remoting a jmx client is not so easy. All classes involved must be serializable or mbeans i think. And this is not the case at all (the client has a pointer to the container, the DefaultDestination has a pointer to the client, etc..) So if we want to go that way, we have to provide w

Re: Bug in StaxSource class

2006-07-25 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Could you please raise a JIRA and attach any patch / test case you have, please ? Cheers, Guillaume Nodet On 7/25/06, Holger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We are playing around with servicemix and the jsr181 component when we run into a strange problem. We are sending a SOAP request to a defined

[jira] Updated: (SM-481) servicemix-http provider truncates a large xml response

2006-07-25 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-481?page=all ] Guillaume Nodet updated SM-481: --- Fix Version/s: 3.0 (was: incubation) > servicemix-http provider truncates a large xml response > -

what's the servicemix's connection capability?

2006-07-25 Thread Sharon Yin
Hi, all Do you have any idea about how to test the performance of servicemix and its connection capability? For example, how many binding component does it support on one servicemix instance? how many consumers and providers does it support, as like 4,000 consumers access 4,000 providers at th

Re: TCK

2006-07-25 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Is there a list available somewhere at Apache, like the one for CLAs (http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html) ? Else, I think your proposal is a good idea. Or we could just add a column to the http://servicemix.goopen.org/site/team.html. Cheers, Guillaume Nodet On 7/25/06, James Strachan