On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 14:29:38 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
>> The default setting for the ObjectInputFilter for JMX, introduced in jdk20,
>> is too restrictive.
>> javax.management.Attribute and AttributeList classes are also needed, and
>> Query related classes.
>>
>> There are a number of Query-re
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 09:40:11 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> The default setting for the ObjectInputFilter for JMX, introduced in jdk20,
> is too restrictive.
> javax.management.Attribute and AttributeList classes are also needed, and
> Query related classes.
>
> There are a number of Query-related
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 14:30:29 GMT, Justin King wrote:
> Redo [JDK-8301378](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8301378), this time
> also fixing the serviceability code.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 7c6a8db3
Author:Justin King
Committer: Tobias Hartmann
URL:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 14:30:29 GMT, Justin King wrote:
> Redo [JDK-8301378](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8301378), this time
> also fixing the serviceability code.
Looks good to me and Vladimir's testing all passed.
-
Marked as reviewed by thartmann (Reviewer).
PR: https://g
On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 21:02:51 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> jdb creates a ThreadStartRequest and ThreadDeathRequest so it can track all
> created threads. It creates them with the SUSPEND_ALL policy. This is
> unnecessary since jdb always immediately resumes all threads after doing the
> thread b
Forwardport JDK 20 -> JDK 21
-
Commit messages:
- Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk20/master' into Merge_jdk20
- 8298377: JfrVframeStream causes deadlocks in ZGC
- 8299891: JMX ObjectInputFilter additional classes needed
The merge commit only contains trivial merges, so no merge-s
> classFileParser drops stack map frames for JDK classes (when verification is
> not required).
> As a result JvmtiClassFileReconstituter cannot restore the attribute for
> class redefinition.
> Note that if the class is in CDS archive, the frames are restored from CDS,
> so this issue affects o
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 19:43:51 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson
wrote:
> Forwardport JDK 20 -> JDK 21
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: d6832121
Author:Jesper Wilhelmsson
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/d6832121b718d40df263da6e2f9261dee2c4c508
Stats: 158 lines i
This test started failing after
[JDK-8300811](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8300811), which made the jdb
ThreadStartRequest and ThreadDeathRequest use SUSPEND_NONE instead of
SUSPEND_ALL. This sped up the handling of these events a lot, which has
impacted the timing of this test and expos
> classFileParser drops stack map frames for JDK classes (when verification is
> not required).
> As a result JvmtiClassFileReconstituter cannot restore the attribute for
> class redefinition.
> Note that if the class is in CDS archive, the frames are restored from CDS,
> so this issue affects o
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 04:22:48 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> "retransform"
fixed
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12155
On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 00:20:06 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote:
>> I'd also suggest a couple of name changes to increase readability:
>> loadBytes => loadedBytes
>> retransformBytes => retransformedBytes
>
>> "retransform"
>
> fixed
> I'd also suggest a couple of name changes to increase readability: l
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 03:58:02 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>
> Copyright needs updating.
It was updated by other fix in master branch
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12155
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 23:51:02 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> This test started failing after
> [JDK-8300811](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8300811), which made the
> jdb ThreadStartRequest and ThreadDeathRequest use SUSPEND_NONE instead of
> SUSPEND_ALL. This sped up the handling of these eve
Small, trivial change to resolve initialization order reordering in
constructors, required for
[JDK-8301659](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8301659)
-
Commit messages:
- Resolve reordering issues in libawt and libsaproc
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12382/files
W
On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 06:12:20 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
> Small, trivial change to resolve initialization order reordering in
> constructors, required for
> [JDK-8301659](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8301659)
Bundling unrelated changes like this together is rarely a good idea, but these
16 matches
Mail list logo