On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 06:20:28 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
> This PR reverts JDK-8276687, which has caused tier1 test failures.
Marked as reviewed by redestad (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10711
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 06:20:28 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
> This PR reverts JDK-8276687, which has caused tier1 test failures.
Marked as reviewed by kevinw (Committer).
Hi, are you sure you want to back this out?
I'll click approve as backout change I think looks OK.
I see test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceabi
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 06:20:28 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
> This PR reverts JDK-8276687, which has caused tier1 test failures.
@iklam - Are you planning to integrate this [BACKOUT] soon? The CI looks like
a train wreck in Tier1 and Tier3 so far...
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/1071
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 01:19:27 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
> > Here is the basic support for RISC-V:
> > https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8291555/riscv-patch-1.patch
> > -- I adapted this from AArch64 changes, and tested it very lightly.
> > @RealFYang, can I leave the testing and follow up fixes to y
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 13:45:07 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
> > > Here is the basic support for RISC-V:
> > > https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8291555/riscv-patch-1.patch
> > > -- I adapted this from AArch64 changes, and tested it very lightly.
> > > @RealFYang, can I leave the testing and follow up fi
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 06:20:28 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
> This PR reverts JDK-8276687, which has caused tier1 test failures.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: dfcd9d53
Author:Ioi Lam
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/dfcd9d538eba4b097083abe19d02d6d019236ac7
Stats:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 14:26:20 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
> > > > Here is the basic support for RISC-V:
> > > > https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8291555/riscv-patch-1.patch
> > > > -- I adapted this from AArch64 changes, and tested it very lightly.
> > > > @RealFYang, can I leave the testing and
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 14:32:57 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
> > > > > Here is the basic support for RISC-V:
> > > > > https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8291555/riscv-patch-1.patch
> > > > > -- I adapted this from AArch64 changes, and tested it very lightly.
> > > > > @RealFYang, can I leave the testing
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 14:39:01 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
> > > > > > Here is the basic support for RISC-V:
> > > > > > https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8291555/riscv-patch-1.patch
> > > > > > -- I adapted this from AArch64 changes, and tested it very lightly.
> > > > > > @RealFYang, can I leave
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 14:53:57 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
> > > > > > > Here is the basic support for RISC-V:
> > > > > > > https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8291555/riscv-patch-1.patch
> > > > > > > -- I adapted this from AArch64 changes, and tested it very
> > > > > > > lightly. @RealFYang, can I le
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 09:53:23 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> Hi, are you sure you want to back this out? I'll click approve as backout
> change I think looks OK.
>
> I see test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/dcmd/framework/VMVersionTest.java
> failing SOMETIMES for me. I think you already noted that
On Fri, 7 Oct 2022 19:54:54 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> There are a few changes we can make to better understand the LingeredApp test
> when it goes wrong:
>
> startAppExactJvmOpts() should not try and call finishApp unless the process
> isAlive, that just creates a misleading exception.
>
> wa
On Fri, 7 Oct 2022 19:54:54 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> There are a few changes we can make to better understand the LingeredApp test
> when it goes wrong:
>
> startAppExactJvmOpts() should not try and call finishApp unless the process
> isAlive, that just creates a misleading exception.
>
> wa
13 matches
Mail list logo
