On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 02:17:33 GMT, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>> Optimize constructor to skip extra copy for registers. The tier1 tests are
>> OK. The Specjvm2008 benchmark reports ~1% improvement.
>
> Vladimir Ivanov has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase.
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 02:17:33 GMT, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>> Optimize constructor to skip extra copy for registers. The tier1 tests are
>> OK. The Specjvm2008 benchmark reports ~1% improvement.
>
> Vladimir Ivanov has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase.
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 02:17:33 GMT, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>> Optimize constructor to skip extra copy for registers. The tier1 tests are
>> OK. The Specjvm2008 benchmark reports ~1% improvement.
>
> Vladimir Ivanov has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase.
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 02:17:33 GMT, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>> Optimize constructor to skip extra copy for registers. The tier1 tests are
>> OK. The Specjvm2008 benchmark reports ~1% improvement.
>
> Vladimir Ivanov has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase.
> Optimize constructor to skip extra copy for registers. The tier1 tests are
> OK. The Specjvm2008 benchmark reports ~1% improvement.
Vladimir Ivanov has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
brought in
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:20:10 GMT, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> Optimize constructor to skip extra copy for registers. The tier1 tests are
> OK. The Specjvm2008 benchmark reports ~1% improvement.
@kimbarrett - Hi! This is the issue with copy constructors that I mentioned in
the parking lot a while
