Re: RFR: 8340363: User-specified default decorators for UnifiedLogging

2024-09-19 Thread Johan Sjölen
On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 01:30:30 GMT, David Holmes wrote: > Finally, this is really subjective. You'd really need to socialise the actual > proposed changes to the defaults independent of any mechanism to allow it. By that you mean the `jit+inlining` default, right? That has been socialized among

Re: RFR: 8340363: User-specified default decorators for UnifiedLogging

2024-09-19 Thread Johan Sjölen
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 09:03:55 GMT, Antón Seoane wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently, the Unified Logging framework defaults to three decorators > (uptime, level, tags) whenever the user does not specify otherwise through > `-Xlog`. This can result in cumbersome input whenever a specific user that >

Re: RFR: 8340363: User-specified default decorators for UnifiedLogging

2024-09-19 Thread Roberto Castañeda Lozano
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 09:03:55 GMT, Antón Seoane wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently, the Unified Logging framework defaults to three decorators > (uptime, level, tags) whenever the user does not specify otherwise through > `-Xlog`. This can result in cumbersome input whenever a specific user that >

Re: RFR: 8340363: User-specified default decorators for UnifiedLogging

2024-09-19 Thread Roberto Castañeda Lozano
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 09:03:55 GMT, Antón Seoane wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently, the Unified Logging framework defaults to three decorators > (uptime, level, tags) whenever the user does not specify otherwise through > `-Xlog`. This can result in cumbersome input whenever a specific user that >

Re: RFR: 8340363: User-specified default decorators for UnifiedLogging

2024-09-18 Thread David Holmes
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 09:03:55 GMT, Antón Seoane wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently, the Unified Logging framework defaults to three decorators > (uptime, level, tags) whenever the user does not specify otherwise through > `-Xlog`. This can result in cumbersome input whenever a specific user that >