On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:54:36 GMT, Joakim Nordström
wrote:
>> Can I get a review of this documentation update to clarify the usage of
>> GetCpuLoad (and inherently deprecated GetSystemCpuLoad) and
>> GetProcessCpuLoad.
>>
>> Calling either of these methods in quick succession can lead to
>> u
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:54:36 GMT, Joakim Nordström
wrote:
>> Can I get a review of this documentation update to clarify the usage of
>> GetCpuLoad (and inherently deprecated GetSystemCpuLoad) and
>> GetProcessCpuLoad.
>>
>> Calling either of these methods in quick succession can lead to
>> u
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:54:36 GMT, Joakim Nordström
wrote:
>> Can I get a review of this documentation update to clarify the usage of
>> GetCpuLoad (and inherently deprecated GetSystemCpuLoad) and
>> GetProcessCpuLoad.
>>
>> Calling either of these methods in quick succession can lead to
>> u
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:51:08 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Reviewing the current implementation this seems to be the case.
>>
>> The `@implNote` was more meant as an explanation to why the result could be
>> affected by other callers. Since the `@apiNote` also states that the
>> "observation pe
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:46:41 GMT, Joakim Nordström
wrote:
>> src/jdk.management/share/classes/com/sun/management/OperatingSystemMXBean.java
>> line 154:
>>
>>> 152: * affecting the observation period and the result.
>>> 153: *
>>> 154: * @implNote There is only one observation p
On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 12:01:43 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Joakim Nordström has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Added implNote and made some re-arrangements
>
> src/jdk.management/share/classes/com/sun/management/OperatingSyste
> Can I get a review of this documentation update to clarify the usage of
> GetCpuLoad (and inherently deprecated GetSystemCpuLoad) and GetProcessCpuLoad.
>
> Calling either of these methods in quick succession can lead to
> unrepresentative results due to too few data points.
>
> This behavior
On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:49:38 GMT, Joakim Nordström
wrote:
>> Can I get a review of this documentation update to clarify the usage of
>> GetCpuLoad (and inherently deprecated GetSystemCpuLoad) and
>> GetProcessCpuLoad.
>>
>> Calling either of these methods in quick succession can lead to
>> u
On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:49:38 GMT, Joakim Nordström
wrote:
>> Can I get a review of this documentation update to clarify the usage of
>> GetCpuLoad (and inherently deprecated GetSystemCpuLoad) and
>> GetProcessCpuLoad.
>>
>> Calling either of these methods in quick succession can lead to
>> u
On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:49:38 GMT, Joakim Nordström
wrote:
>> Can I get a review of this documentation update to clarify the usage of
>> GetCpuLoad (and inherently deprecated GetSystemCpuLoad) and
>> GetProcessCpuLoad.
>>
>> Calling either of these methods in quick succession can lead to
>> u
> Can I get a review of this documentation update to clarify the usage of
> GetCpuLoad (and inherently deprecated GetSystemCpuLoad) and GetProcessCpuLoad.
>
> Calling either of these methods in quick succession can lead to
> unrepresentative results due to too few data points.
>
> This behavior
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 13:42:18 GMT, Joakim Nordström
wrote:
>> Can I get a review of this documentation update to clarify the usage of
>> GetCpuLoad (and inherently deprecated GetSystemCpuLoad) and
>> GetProcessCpuLoad.
>>
>> Calling either of these methods in quick succession can lead to
>> u
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 22:27:27 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> I want to provide advice for how this API should be used.
>>
>> The "recent period of time observed" is vague (Who's the observer? Who
>> decides the "recent period"? The API user or the JVM?). In essence it is the
>> time between two co
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 13:49:08 GMT, Joakim Nordström
wrote:
>> Ok yes maybe "not idempotent" isn't a great term here.
>> Just removing that phrase, "This method is not idempotent.", this would
>> still be a helpful update.
>
> I want to provide advice for how this API should be used.
>
> The "re
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 13:42:18 GMT, Joakim Nordström
wrote:
>> Can I get a review of this documentation update to clarify the usage of
>> GetCpuLoad (and inherently deprecated GetSystemCpuLoad) and
>> GetProcessCpuLoad.
>>
>> Calling either of these methods in quick succession can lead to
>> u
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 12:25:48 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
>> You beat me to it. We specify some methods (close, dispose, ...) as
>> idempotent. Specifying a getter as non-idempotent looks very strange here.
>>
>> I can't tell if you are looking to specify implementation behavior (as David
>> asks)
> Can I get a review of this documentation update to clarify the usage of
> GetCpuLoad (and inherently deprecated GetSystemCpuLoad) and GetProcessCpuLoad.
>
> Calling either of these methods in quick succession can lead to
> unrepresentative results due to too few data points.
>
> This behavior
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 11:35:26 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> src/jdk.management/share/classes/com/sun/management/OperatingSystemMXBean.java
>> line 142:
>>
>>> 140: * negative value.
>>> 141: *
>>> 142: * This method is not idempotent. The recent period of
>>> observation
>>
>> I
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 11:27:44 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Can I get a review of this documentation update to clarify the usage of
>> GetCpuLoad (and inherently deprecated GetSystemCpuLoad) and
>> GetProcessCpuLoad.
>>
>> Calling either of these methods in quick succession can lead to
>> unrepr
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 12:33:04 GMT, Joakim Nordström
wrote:
> Can I get a review of this documentation update to clarify the usage of
> GetCpuLoad (and inherently deprecated GetSystemCpuLoad) and GetProcessCpuLoad.
>
> Calling either of these methods in quick succession can lead to
> unrepresen
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 12:33:04 GMT, Joakim Nordström
wrote:
> Can I get a review of this documentation update to clarify the usage of
> GetCpuLoad (and inherently deprecated GetSystemCpuLoad) and GetProcessCpuLoad.
>
> Calling either of these methods in quick succession can lead to
> unrepresen
21 matches
Mail list logo
