On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:39:41 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
>>> > > > > > Here is the basic support for RISC-V:
>>> > > > > > https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8291555/riscv-patch-1.patch
>>> > > > > > -- I adapted this from AArch64 changes, and tested it very
>>> > > > > > lightly. @RealFYang, can
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 14:53:57 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
> > > > > > > Here is the basic support for RISC-V:
> > > > > > > https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8291555/riscv-patch-1.patch
> > > > > > > -- I adapted this from AArch64 changes, and tested it very
> > > > > > > lightly. @RealFYang, can I le
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 14:39:01 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
> > > > > > Here is the basic support for RISC-V:
> > > > > > https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8291555/riscv-patch-1.patch
> > > > > > -- I adapted this from AArch64 changes, and tested it very lightly.
> > > > > > @RealFYang, can I leave
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 14:32:57 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
> > > > > Here is the basic support for RISC-V:
> > > > > https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8291555/riscv-patch-1.patch
> > > > > -- I adapted this from AArch64 changes, and tested it very lightly.
> > > > > @RealFYang, can I leave the testing
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 14:26:20 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
> > > > Here is the basic support for RISC-V:
> > > > https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8291555/riscv-patch-1.patch
> > > > -- I adapted this from AArch64 changes, and tested it very lightly.
> > > > @RealFYang, can I leave the testing and
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 13:45:07 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
> > > Here is the basic support for RISC-V:
> > > https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8291555/riscv-patch-1.patch
> > > -- I adapted this from AArch64 changes, and tested it very lightly.
> > > @RealFYang, can I leave the testing and follow up fi
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 01:19:27 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
> > Here is the basic support for RISC-V:
> > https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8291555/riscv-patch-1.patch
> > -- I adapted this from AArch64 changes, and tested it very lightly.
> > @RealFYang, can I leave the testing and follow up fixes to y
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:26:16 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Here is the basic support for RISC-V:
> https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8291555/riscv-patch-1.patch
>
> -- I adapted this from AArch64 changes, and tested it very lightly.
> @RealFYang, can I leave the testing and follow up fixes t
On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 20:41:57 GMT, Robbin Ehn wrote:
> Regarding benchmarks, is it possible to get some indication what
> fast-locking+lillput result will be? FinagleHttp seems to suffer a bit, will
> Lillput give some/all of that back, or more?
That particular benchmark, as some others, exhibi
On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 20:01:32 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> This change replaces the current stack-locking implementation with a
>> fast-locking scheme that retains the advantages of stack-locking (namely
>> fast locking in uncontended code-paths), while avoiding the overload of the
>> mark word.
On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 20:01:32 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> This change replaces the current stack-locking implementation with a
>> fast-locking scheme that retains the advantages of stack-locking (namely
>> fast locking in uncontended code-paths), while avoiding the overload of the
>> mark word.
On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 13:25:30 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Roman Kennke has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/fast-locking' into fast-locking
>> - Re-use r0 in call to unlock_object()
>
> This change replaces the current stack-locking implementation with a
> fast-locking scheme that retains the advantages of stack-locking (namely fast
> locking in uncontended code-paths), while avoiding the overload of the mark
> word. That overloading causes massive problems with Lilliput, bec
13 matches
Mail list logo
