> On 22 May 2023, at 15:01, Andrew Dinn wrote:
>
> Hi Ron,
>
> I've been studiously reading all the discussion on the integrity JEP
> (currently numbered 8305968) -- whether direct comments in this thread or
> indirect comments from the various threads that relate to changing the
> dynamic
Hi Ron,
I've been studiously reading all the discussion on the integrity JEP
(currently numbered 8305968) -- whether direct comments in this thread
or indirect comments from the various threads that relate to changing
the dynamic agent load default. It seems obvious to me that there is a
rath
> On 11 May 2023, at 12:04, Dan Heidinga wrote:
>
> I had read this JEP as a position statement on future directions given it
> refers to the preventing dynamic loading of agents (a future action) and
> restricting JNI (future) while also talking about strong encapsulation (past).
Restrictin
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 2:42 PM Ron Pressler
wrote:
> Before I get to your specific points, let me clarify that this
> informational JEP is a summary of *past* work and decisions (except maybe
> the FFM/JNI restriction) that, though already delivered or announced, their
> full motivation was neve
Before I get to your specific points, let me clarify that this informational
JEP is a summary of *past* work and decisions (except maybe the FFM/JNI
restriction) that, though already delivered or announced, their full motivation
was never canonised in JEP form. Everything it describes has either
Thanks for the response, Ron.
My comments are in line.
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 8:10 AM Ron Pressler wrote:
>
>
> On 4 May 2023, at 21:32, Dan Heidinga wrote:
>
>
> I’ve read this draft a number of times and each time I struggled with the
> framing of the problem given Java’s success over the pa
On 4 May 2023, at 21:32, Dan Heidinga
mailto:heidi...@redhat.com>> wrote:
I’ve read this draft a number of times and each time I struggled with the
framing of the problem given Java’s success over the past almost 30 years.
The old regime worked when: 1. Almost all the runtime was written in
Hi Ron,
I’ve read this draft a number of times and each time I struggled with the
framing of the problem given Java’s success over the past almost 30 years.
Framing the problem with statements like:
“Strong encapsulation offers a solid foundation to build on.
Without it, code is a cas
