On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 08:11:00 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
> Looks good to me!
Thank you @rkennke !
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14826#issuecomment-1632130286
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:20:19 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> In preparation for some Lilliput-related changes, I'd like to get some purely
> mechanical code moves out of the way. It would also improve separation of
> concerns and reduces include header bloat.
>
> In particular, this patch does:
>
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 23:33:52 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
> Looks reasonable to me.
Thank you Ioi.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14826#issuecomment-1631862898
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:20:19 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> In preparation for some Lilliput-related changes, I'd like to get some purely
> mechanical code moves out of the way. It would also improve separation of
> concerns and reduces include header bloat.
>
> In particular, this patch does:
>
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:20:19 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> In preparation for some Lilliput-related changes, I'd like to get some purely
> mechanical code moves out of the way. It would also improve separation of
> concerns and reduces include header bloat.
>
> In particular, this patch does:
>
In preparation for some Lilliput-related changes, I'd like to get some purely
mechanical code moves out of the way. It would also improve separation of
concerns and reduces include header bloat.
In particular, this patch does:
1) Move `CompressedKlassPointers` from `compressedOops.(cpp|hpp|inli
