On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 21:34:03 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> The bug [JDK-8312064](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8312064) is not
> reproducible anymore and will be closed as a dup of
> [JDK-8316682](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8316682).
> The test SuspendWithInterruptLock needs to b
On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 21:34:03 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> The bug [JDK-8312064](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8312064) is not
> reproducible anymore and will be closed as a dup of
> [JDK-8316682](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8316682).
> The test SuspendWithInterruptLock needs to b
On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 21:34:03 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> The bug [JDK-8312064](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8312064) is not
> reproducible anymore and will be closed as a dup of
> [JDK-8316682](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8316682).
> The test SuspendWithInterruptLock needs to b
The bug [JDK-8312064](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8312064) is not
reproducible anymore and will be closed as a dup of
[JDK-8316682](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8316682).
The test SuspendWithInterruptLock needs to be unproblem-listed.
-
Commit messages:
- update copy
On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 21:34:03 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> The bug [JDK-8312064](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8312064) is not
> reproducible anymore and will be closed as a dup of
> [JDK-8316682](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8316682).
> The test SuspendWithInterruptLock needs to b
