On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 11:26:22 GMT, Anton Artemov wrote:
>> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
>> obsoletion.
>>
>> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it
>> while he's on vacation.
>>
>> In the 1st phase one keeps the `Lockin
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 11:26:22 GMT, Anton Artemov wrote:
>> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
>> obsoletion.
>>
>> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it
>> while he's on vacation.
>>
>> In the 1st phase one keeps the `Lockin
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 11:35:51 GMT, Anton Artemov wrote:
>> test/jdk/jdk/internal/vm/Continuation/Fuzz.java line 477:
>>
>>> 475: boolean shouldPin() {
>>> 476: // Returns false since we never pin after we removed legacy
>>> locking.
>>> 477: return traceHas(Op.PIN::contains)
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 10:39:59 GMT, Anton Artemov wrote:
>> test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/Monitor/StressWrapper_TestRecursiveLocking_36M.java
>> line 36:
>>
>>> 34: * -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:+WhiteBoxAPI
>>> 35: * -Xint
>>> 36: * -XX:LockingMode=0
>>
>> I was wondering why
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 10:05:36 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Anton Artemov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8359437: Addressed reviewer's comments.
>
> test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/Monitor/ConcurrentDeflation.java line 79:
>
>>
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 03:09:06 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Anton Artemov has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - 8359437: Addressed reviewers' comments
>> - 8359437: Addressed reviewers' comments
>
> test/jtreg-ext/requires/VMPr
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 11:26:22 GMT, Anton Artemov wrote:
>> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
>> obsoletion.
>>
>> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it
>> while he's on vacation.
>>
>> In the 1st phase one keeps the `Lockin
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 11:26:22 GMT, Anton Artemov wrote:
>> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
>> obsoletion.
>>
>> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it
>> while he's on vacation.
>>
>> In the 1st phase one keeps the `Lockin
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 17:04:37 GMT, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
>> Anton Artemov has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - 8359437: Addressed reviewers' comments
>> - 8359437: Addressed reviewers' comments
>
> test/hotspot/jtreg/gtest/Lo
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 11:13:32 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Anton Artemov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8359437: Addressed reviewer's comment
>
> test/jdk/jdk/internal/vm/Continuation/Fuzz.java line 477:
>
>> 475: boo
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 11:26:22 GMT, Anton Artemov wrote:
>> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
>> obsoletion.
>>
>> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it
>> while he's on vacation.
>>
>> In the 1st phase one keeps the `Lockin
> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
> obsoletion.
>
> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it while
> he's on vacation.
>
> In the 1st phase one keeps the `LockingMode` variable in all places, but
> makes it non-settable from
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 13:25:20 GMT, Anton Artemov wrote:
>> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
>> obsoletion.
>>
>> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it
>> while he's on vacation.
>>
>> In the 1st phase one keeps the `Lockin
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 09:12:00 GMT, Anton Artemov wrote:
>> test/jtreg-ext/requires/VMProps.java line 424:
>>
>>> 422: * Note: Lightweight locking does not support RTM (for now).
>>> 423: */
>>> 424: protected String vmRTMCompiler() {
>>
>> [JDK-8358542](https://bugs.openjdk.org/bro
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 13:25:20 GMT, Anton Artemov wrote:
>> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
>> obsoletion.
>>
>> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it
>> while he's on vacation.
>>
>> In the 1st phase one keeps the `Lockin
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 12:43:36 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Anton Artemov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8359437: Addressed reviewer's comments
>
> test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/vthread/StopThreadTest/StopThreadTe
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 12:44:52 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Anton Artemov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8359437: Addressed reviewer's comment
>
> test/jdk/jdk/internal/vm/Continuation/Basic.java line 426:
>
>> 424:
> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
> obsoletion.
>
> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it while
> he's on vacation.
>
> In the 1st phase one keeps the `LockingMode` variable in all places, but
> makes it non-settable from
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 11:16:21 GMT, Anton Artemov wrote:
>> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
>> obsoletion.
>>
>> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it
>> while he's on vacation.
>>
>> In the 1st phase one keeps the `Lockin
> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
> obsoletion.
>
> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it while
> he's on vacation.
>
> In the 1st phase one keeps the `LockingMode` variable in all places, but
> makes it non-settable from
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 11:16:21 GMT, Anton Artemov wrote:
>> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
>> obsoletion.
>>
>> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it
>> while he's on vacation.
>>
>> In the 1st phase one keeps the `Lockin
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 09:14:42 GMT, Anton Artemov wrote:
>> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
>> obsoletion.
>>
>> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it
>> while he's on vacation.
>>
>> In the 1st phase one keeps the `Lockin
On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 08:39:49 GMT, Anton Artemov wrote:
> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
> obsoletion.
>
> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it while
> he's on vacation.
>
> In the 1st phase one keeps the `LockingMode`
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 09:14:37 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Anton Artemov has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - 8359437: Addressed reviewers' comments
>> - 8359437: Addressed reviewers' comments
>
> test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/M
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 09:59:50 GMT, Anton Artemov wrote:
>> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
>> obsoletion.
>>
>> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it
>> while he's on vacation.
>>
>> In the 1st phase one keeps the `Lockin
> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
> obsoletion.
>
> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it while
> he's on vacation.
>
> In the 1st phase one keeps the `LockingMode` variable in all places, but
> makes it non-settable from
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 15:48:41 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Anton Artemov has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - 8359437: Addressed reviewers' comments
>> - 8359437: Addressed reviewers' comments
>
> test/jdk/java/lang/Thread/vi
> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
> obsoletion.
>
> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it while
> he's on vacation.
>
> In the 1st phase one keeps the `LockingMode` variable in all places, but
> makes it non-settable from
On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 08:39:49 GMT, Anton Artemov wrote:
> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
> obsoletion.
>
> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it while
> he's on vacation.
>
> In the 1st phase one keeps the `LockingMode`
On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 08:39:49 GMT, Anton Artemov wrote:
> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
> obsoletion.
>
> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it while
> he's on vacation.
>
> In the 1st phase one keeps the `LockingMode`
On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 08:39:49 GMT, Anton Artemov wrote:
> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
> obsoletion.
>
> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it while
> he's on vacation.
>
> In the 1st phase one keeps the `LockingMode`
On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 07:52:02 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
>> obsoletion.
>>
>> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it
>> while he's on vacation.
>>
>> In the 1st phase one keeps the `Locking
On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 18:23:58 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
>> obsoletion.
>>
>> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it
>> while he's on vacation.
>>
>> In the 1st phase one keeps the `Lo
On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 07:37:31 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
>> obsoletion.
>>
>> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it
>> while he's on vacation.
>>
>> In the 1st phase one keeps the `Locking
On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 08:39:49 GMT, Anton Artemov wrote:
> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
> obsoletion.
>
> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it while
> he's on vacation.
>
> In the 1st phase one keeps the `LockingMode`
On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 08:39:49 GMT, Anton Artemov wrote:
> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
> obsoletion.
>
> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it while
> he's on vacation.
>
> In the 1st phase one keeps the `LockingMode`
This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
obsoletion.
The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it while
he's on vacation.
In the 1st phase one keeps the `LockingMode` variable in all places, but makes
it non-settable from the command lin
37 matches
Mail list logo
