Re: RFR: 8346123: [REDO] NMT should not use ThreadCritical [v11]

2024-12-23 Thread Robert Toyonaga
On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 07:16:22 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote: >> Robert Toyonaga has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> move boostrapping_done flag into Mutex from MutexLocker > > src/hotspot/share/nmt/threadStackTracker.cpp line 55: >

Re: RFR: 8346123: [REDO] NMT should not use ThreadCritical [v11]

2024-12-23 Thread Thomas Stuefe
On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 16:57:08 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote: >> Robert Toyonaga has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> move boostrapping_done flag into Mutex from MutexLocker > > src/hotspot/share/runtime/mutexLocker.cpp line 291: > >>

Re: RFR: 8346123: [REDO] NMT should not use ThreadCritical [v11]

2024-12-22 Thread Kim Barrett
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 21:29:18 GMT, Robert Toyonaga wrote: >> This is a redo of [JDK-8304824](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8304824) >> which was backed out by >> [JDK-8343726](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8343726) due to problems >> documented in [JDK-8343244](https://bugs.openjdk.

Re: RFR: 8346123: [REDO] NMT should not use ThreadCritical [v11]

2024-12-20 Thread Robert Toyonaga
> This is a redo of [JDK-8304824](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8304824) > which was backed out by > [JDK-8343726](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8343726) due to problems > documented in [JDK-8343244](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8343244). > > The problem was that `NmtVirtualM