On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 22:34:24 GMT, Patricio Chilano Mateo
wrote:
> Small follow-up change after JDK-8338383. This moves the `objectWaiter` field
> from the stackChunk to the VirtualThread instance. Only the top stackChunk
> uses this field so we could save some memory by just saving it in the v
On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 22:34:24 GMT, Patricio Chilano Mateo
wrote:
> Small follow-up change after JDK-8338383. This moves the `objectWaiter` field
> from the stackChunk to the VirtualThread instance. Only the top stackChunk
> uses this field so we could save some memory by just saving it in the v
On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 22:34:24 GMT, Patricio Chilano Mateo
wrote:
> Small follow-up change after JDK-8338383. This moves the `objectWaiter` field
> from the stackChunk to the VirtualThread instance. Only the top stackChunk
> uses this field so we could save some memory by just saving it in the v
Small follow-up change after JDK-8338383. This moves the `objectWaiter` field
from the stackChunk to the VirtualThread instance. Only the top stackChunk uses
this field so we could save some memory by just saving it in the virtual thread
instance instead. Also, related methods
`stackChunkOopDes
