On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:15:27 GMT, Martin Doerr wrote:
> Using the FP as raw_unextendedSP is wrong and causes problems like
> [JDK-8339772](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339772).
> "test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability" tests have passed with this PR.
Test results look good.
-
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:15:27 GMT, Martin Doerr wrote:
> Using the FP as raw_unextendedSP is wrong and causes problems like
> [JDK-8339772](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339772).
> "test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability" tests have passed with this PR.
Thanks a lot for looking at the issue an
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:15:27 GMT, Martin Doerr wrote:
> Using the FP as raw_unextendedSP is wrong and causes problems like
> [JDK-8339772](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339772).
> "test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability" tests have passed with this PR.
Marked as reviewed by mbaesken (Reviewer
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:15:27 GMT, Martin Doerr wrote:
> Using the FP as raw_unextendedSP is wrong and causes problems like
> [JDK-8339772](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339772).
> "test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability" tests have passed with this PR.
I'm not familiar with call frames on PPC
Using the FP as raw_unextendedSP is wrong and causes problems like
[JDK-8339772](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339772).
"test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability" tests have passed with this PR.
-
Commit messages:
- 8340657: [PPC64] SA determines wrong unextendedSP
Changes: https:/