Re: RFR: 8318026: jcmd should provide access to detailed JVM object information [v15]

2024-04-09 Thread David Holmes
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 12:10:57 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote: > EnableVMInspectCommand I can live with that. - PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17655#issuecomment-2046351694

Re: RFR: 8318026: jcmd should provide access to detailed JVM object information [v15]

2024-04-09 Thread Kevin Walls
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 06:00:21 GMT, David Holmes wrote: > sounds far too general. I would have expected something that was obviously > connected to jcmd and/or the specific jcmd under discussion. I don't expect so many more of these, but EnableVMInspectDCmd looked too specific, I didn't want to p

Re: RFR: 8318026: jcmd should provide access to detailed JVM object information [v15]

2024-04-08 Thread David Holmes
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 15:54:30 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote: >> Introduce the jcmd "VM.inspect" to implement access to detailed JVM object >> information. >> >> Not recommended for live production use. Requires UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions >> and not included in jcmd help output, to remind us this is not

Re: RFR: 8318026: jcmd should provide access to detailed JVM object information [v15]

2024-04-08 Thread Serguei Spitsyn
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 15:54:30 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote: >> Introduce the jcmd "VM.inspect" to implement access to detailed JVM object >> information. >> >> Not recommended for live production use. Requires UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions >> and not included in jcmd help output, to remind us this is not

Re: RFR: 8318026: jcmd should provide access to detailed JVM object information [v15]

2024-04-08 Thread Kevin Walls
> Introduce the jcmd "VM.inspect" to implement access to detailed JVM object > information. > > Not recommended for live production use. Requires UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions > and not included in jcmd help output, to remind us this is not a > general-purpose customer-facing tool. Kevin Walls ha