On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 19:53:19 GMT, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
> Could you please add comment why standard CountDownLatch doesn't work for
> this test.
Okay. Added comment.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15467#issuecomment-1714574938
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 09:08:26 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
>> This update fixes two important issues:
>> - Issue reported by a bug submitter about missing JVMTI events on virtual
>> threads after an a JVMTI agent dynamic attach
>> - Known scalability/performance issue: a need to lazily create
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 09:08:26 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
>> This update fixes two important issues:
>> - Issue reported by a bug submitter about missing JVMTI events on virtual
>> threads after an a JVMTI agent dynamic attach
>> - Known scalability/performance issue: a need to lazily create
> This update fixes two important issues:
> - Issue reported by a bug submitter about missing JVMTI events on virtual
> threads after an a JVMTI agent dynamic attach
> - Known scalability/performance issue: a need to lazily create
> `JvmtiThreadState's` for virtual threads
>
> The issue is tr
