Re: RFR: 8307448: Test RedefineSharedClassJFR fail due to wrong assumption

2023-05-04 Thread Stefan Johansson
On Thu, 4 May 2023 12:36:27 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote: >> Please review this fix to avoid a tier1 test failure. >> >> **Summary** >> The newly added test wrongfully assumed that one of the transformed classes >> would be in use. This seem to be the case in most runs, but there is no >> guar

Re: RFR: 8307448: Test RedefineSharedClassJFR fail due to wrong assumption

2023-05-04 Thread Coleen Phillimore
On Thu, 4 May 2023 12:08:28 GMT, Stefan Johansson wrote: > Please review this fix to avoid a tier1 test failure. > > **Summary** > The newly added test wrongfully assumed that one of the transformed classes > would be in use. This seem to be the case in most runs, but there is no > guarantee.

Re: RFR: 8307448: Test RedefineSharedClassJFR fail due to wrong assumption

2023-05-04 Thread Erik Ă–sterlund
On Thu, 4 May 2023 12:08:28 GMT, Stefan Johansson wrote: > Please review this fix to avoid a tier1 test failure. > > **Summary** > The newly added test wrongfully assumed that one of the transformed classes > would be in use. This seem to be the case in most runs, but there is no > guarantee.

RFR: 8307448: Test RedefineSharedClassJFR fail due to wrong assumption

2023-05-04 Thread Stefan Johansson
Please review this fix to avoid a tier1 test failure. **Summary** The newly added test wrongfully assumed that one of the transformed classes would be in use. This seem to be the case in most runs, but there is no guarantee. This change fixes the test to only verify that nothing is seen as shar