On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 05:51:57 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this trivial doc only change which addresses
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8304988?
>
> I've run `make docs-image` after this change and the generated javadoc for
> this class looks fine.
Thank you Al
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 05:51:57 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this trivial doc only change which addresses
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8304988?
>
> I've run `make docs-image` after this change and the generated javadoc for
> this class looks fine.
Looks good.
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 05:51:57 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this trivial doc only change which addresses
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8304988?
>
> I've run `make docs-image` after this change and the generated javadoc for
> this class looks fine.
Since this i
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 05:51:57 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this trivial doc only change which addresses
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8304988?
>
> I've run `make docs-image` after this change and the generated javadoc for
> this class looks fine.
Marked as re
Can I please get a review of this trivial doc only change which addresses
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8304988?
I've run `make docs-image` after this change and the generated javadoc for this
class looks fine.
-
Commit messages:
- 8304988: unnecessary dash in @param gives d
