On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:56:49 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
> We thought we didn't need the keep-alive call but we do for heap walking.
> Tested with failing test case locally, and tier1-4 in progress.
Thanks Erik and Robbin!
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12202
On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:56:49 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
> We thought we didn't need the keep-alive call but we do for heap walking.
> Tested with failing test case locally, and tier1-4 in progress.
Thanks!
-
Marked as reviewed by rehn (Reviewer).
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk
On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:56:49 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
> We thought we didn't need the keep-alive call but we do for heap walking.
> Tested with failing test case locally, and tier1-4 in progress.
Looks good!
-
Marked as reviewed by eosterlund (Reviewer).
PR: https://git.openj
We thought we didn't need the keep-alive call but we do for heap walking.
Tested with failing test case locally, and tier1-4 in progress.
-
Commit messages:
- 8300913: ZGC: assert(to_addr != 0) failed: Should be forwarded
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12202/files
Webrev