Re: RFR: 8300913: ZGC: assert(to_addr != 0) failed: Should be forwarded

2023-01-26 Thread Coleen Phillimore
On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:56:49 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote: > We thought we didn't need the keep-alive call but we do for heap walking. > Tested with failing test case locally, and tier1-4 in progress. Thanks Erik and Robbin! - PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12202

Re: RFR: 8300913: ZGC: assert(to_addr != 0) failed: Should be forwarded

2023-01-26 Thread Robbin Ehn
On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:56:49 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote: > We thought we didn't need the keep-alive call but we do for heap walking. > Tested with failing test case locally, and tier1-4 in progress. Thanks! - Marked as reviewed by rehn (Reviewer). PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk

Re: RFR: 8300913: ZGC: assert(to_addr != 0) failed: Should be forwarded

2023-01-25 Thread Erik Ă–sterlund
On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:56:49 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote: > We thought we didn't need the keep-alive call but we do for heap walking. > Tested with failing test case locally, and tier1-4 in progress. Looks good! - Marked as reviewed by eosterlund (Reviewer). PR: https://git.openj

RFR: 8300913: ZGC: assert(to_addr != 0) failed: Should be forwarded

2023-01-25 Thread Coleen Phillimore
We thought we didn't need the keep-alive call but we do for heap walking. Tested with failing test case locally, and tier1-4 in progress. - Commit messages: - 8300913: ZGC: assert(to_addr != 0) failed: Should be forwarded Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12202/files Webrev