On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 12:56:18 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
> Please review this patch that removes the remaining uses of non-reentrant
> `getprotobyname` function.
>
> While the protocol number for TCP could theoretically be modified to
> something other than the default `IPPROTO_TCP`, that scena
On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 12:56:18 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
> Please review this patch that removes the remaining uses of non-reentrant
> `getprotobyname` function.
>
> While the protocol number for TCP could theoretically be modified to
> something other than the default `IPPROTO_TCP`, that scena
Please review this patch that removes the remaining uses of non-reentrant
`getprotobyname` function.
While the protocol number for TCP could theoretically be modified to something
other than the default `IPPROTO_TCP`, that scenario would likely not work, and
is not something that we are willing
