On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 03:37:03 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> > Gotta wonder how the fix for 8284027 was tested with the test still
> > on the ProblemList. Or did the ProblemList update just get lost?
>
> I'm not sure. Maybe @alexmenkov remembers.
I don't remember, but most likely by running the tes
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 22:19:16 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty
wrote:
> Gotta wonder how the fix for 8284027 was tested with the test still
> on the ProblemList. Or did the ProblemList update just get lost?
I'm not sure. Maybe @alexmenkov remembers.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/1
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 20:49:53 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> Remove vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/GetAllThreads/allthr001 from vthread problem
> list. [JDK-8284027](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8284027) has been
> fixed.
>
> Ran test on all supported platforms with:
>
> `JTREG_EXTRA_PROBLEM_LISTS=P
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 20:49:53 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> Remove vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/GetAllThreads/allthr001 from vthread problem
> list. [JDK-8284027](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8284027) has been
> fixed.
>
> Ran test on all supported platforms with:
>
> `JTREG_EXTRA_PROBLEM_LISTS=P
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 20:49:53 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> Remove vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/GetAllThreads/allthr001 from vthread problem
> list. [JDK-8284027](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8284027) has been
> fixed.
>
> Ran test on all supported platforms with:
>
> `JTREG_EXTRA_PROBLEM_LISTS=P
Remove vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/GetAllThreads/allthr001 from vthread problem list.
[JDK-8284027](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8284027) has been fixed.
Ran test on all supported platforms with:
`JTREG_EXTRA_PROBLEM_LISTS=ProblemList-svc-vthread.txt
JTREG_MAIN_WRAPPER=Virtual TEST_VM_OPTS=-Dma
