On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:47:23 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>> Remove the notproduct distinction for command line options, rather than
>> trying to wrestle the macros to fix the bug that they've been treated as
>> develop options for some time now. This simplifies the command line option
>> mac
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 20:18:34 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> > Thanks for reviewing, Kim. Is your suggestion to not have a JVMFlag object
> > for develop flags in PRODUCT builds? Presumably to save some footprint? I'm
> > not sure we would win fighting the macros to accomplish this.
>
> Yes, that's t
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:51:03 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
> Thanks for reviewing, Kim. Is your suggestion to not have a JVMFlag object
> for develop flags in PRODUCT builds? Presumably to save some footprint? I'm
> not sure we would win fighting the macros to accomplish this.
Yes, that's the s
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:47:23 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>> Remove the notproduct distinction for command line options, rather than
>> trying to wrestle the macros to fix the bug that they've been treated as
>> develop options for some time now. This simplifies the command line option
>> mac
> Remove the notproduct distinction for command line options, rather than
> trying to wrestle the macros to fix the bug that they've been treated as
> develop options for some time now. This simplifies the command line option
> macros.
>
> Tested with tier1-4, tier1 on Oracle platforms. Also
