On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 13:30:49 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
>> From studying test failures, it looks like the way the test identifies its
>> related processes is failing.
>> It checks the mainArgs of a process by attaching, and looks like it
>> occasionally misses getting a valid match. The hasMainAr
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 13:30:49 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
>> From studying test failures, it looks like the way the test identifies its
>> related processes is failing.
>> It checks the mainArgs of a process by attaching, and looks like it
>> occasionally misses getting a valid match. The hasMainAr
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 13:30:49 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
>> From studying test failures, it looks like the way the test identifies its
>> related processes is failing.
>> It checks the mainArgs of a process by attaching, and looks like it
>> occasionally misses getting a valid match. The hasMainAr
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 13:28:19 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
>> From studying test failures, it looks like the way the test identifies its
>> related processes is failing.
>> It checks the mainArgs of a process by attaching, and looks like it
>> occasionally misses getting a valid match. The hasMainAr
On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 19:10:50 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> From studying test failures, it looks like the way the test identifies its
> related processes is failing.
> It checks the mainArgs of a process by attaching, and looks like it
> occasionally misses getting a valid match. The hasMainArgs me
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 13:28:19 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
>> From studying test failures, it looks like the way the test identifies its
>> related processes is failing.
>> It checks the mainArgs of a process by attaching, and looks like it
>> occasionally misses getting a valid match. The hasMainAr
> From studying test failures, it looks like the way the test identifies its
> related processes is failing.
> It checks the mainArgs of a process by attaching, and looks like it
> occasionally misses getting a valid match. The hasMainArgs method ignores
> exceptions as it is expecting some exc
>From studying test failures, it looks like the way the test identifies its
>related processes is failing.
It checks the mainArgs of a process by attaching, and looks like it
occasionally misses getting a valid match. The hasMainArgs method ignores
exceptions as it is expecting some exceptions:
