Re: RFR: 8340363: Tag-specific default decorators for UnifiedLogging [v4]

2024-09-24 Thread Antón Seoane
> Hi all, > > Currently, the Unified Logging framework defaults to three decorators > (uptime, level, tags) whenever the user does not specify otherwise through > `-Xlog`. This can result in cumbersome input whenever a specific user that > relies on a particular tag(s) has some predefined needs

Re: RFR: 8340363: Tag-specific default decorators for UnifiedLogging [v3]

2024-09-24 Thread Antón Seoane
> Hi all, > > Currently, the Unified Logging framework defaults to three decorators > (uptime, level, tags) whenever the user does not specify otherwise through > `-Xlog`. This can result in cumbersome input whenever a specific user that > relies on a particular tag(s) has some predefined needs

Re: RFR: 8340363: Tag-specific default decorators for UnifiedLogging [v2]

2024-09-24 Thread Antón Seoane
> Hi all, > > Currently, the Unified Logging framework defaults to three decorators > (uptime, level, tags) whenever the user does not specify otherwise through > `-Xlog`. This can result in cumbersome input whenever a specific user that > relies on a particular tag(s) has some predefined needs

Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v23]

2024-09-24 Thread Coleen Phillimore
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:11:43 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote: >> Roman Kennke has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional >> commits since the last revision: >> >> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'lilliput/JEP-450-temporary-fix-branch-2' >> into JDK-8305895-v4 >> - review feed

Re: RFR: 8340363: Tag-specific default decorators for UnifiedLogging

2024-09-24 Thread Antón Seoane
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 09:03:55 GMT, Antón Seoane wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently, the Unified Logging framework defaults to three decorators > (uptime, level, tags) whenever the user does not specify otherwise through > `-Xlog`. This can result in cumbersome input whenever a specific user that >

Re: RFR: 8340363: Tag-specific default decorators for UnifiedLogging

2024-09-24 Thread David Holmes
On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 08:36:12 GMT, Antón Seoane wrote: > These defaults are not meant to target a specific selected output, so nothing > different would occur. Sorry but that doesn't make sense. When you set the tagset defaults they are output agnostic, but once you set A+B on the command-line

Integrated: 8340657: [PPC64] SA determines wrong unextendedSP

2024-09-24 Thread Martin Doerr
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:15:27 GMT, Martin Doerr wrote: > Using the FP as raw_unextendedSP is wrong and causes problems like > [JDK-8339772](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339772). > "test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability" tests have passed with this PR. This pull request has now been integrate

Re: RFR: 8340657: [PPC64] SA determines wrong unextendedSP

2024-09-24 Thread Martin Doerr
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:15:27 GMT, Martin Doerr wrote: > Using the FP as raw_unextendedSP is wrong and causes problems like > [JDK-8339772](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339772). > "test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability" tests have passed with this PR. Test results look good. -

Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v24]

2024-09-24 Thread Roman Kennke
> This is the main body of the JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental). > > It is also a follow-up to #20640, which now also includes (and supersedes) > #20603 and #20605, plus the Tiny Class-Pointers parts that have been > previously missing. > > Main changes: > - Introduction of the (

Re: RFR: 8340657: [PPC64] SA determines wrong unextendedSP

2024-09-24 Thread Martin Doerr
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:15:27 GMT, Martin Doerr wrote: > Using the FP as raw_unextendedSP is wrong and causes problems like > [JDK-8339772](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339772). > "test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability" tests have passed with this PR. Thanks a lot for looking at the issue an

Re: RFR: 8340657: [PPC64] SA determines wrong unextendedSP

2024-09-24 Thread Matthias Baesken
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:15:27 GMT, Martin Doerr wrote: > Using the FP as raw_unextendedSP is wrong and causes problems like > [JDK-8339772](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339772). > "test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability" tests have passed with this PR. Marked as reviewed by mbaesken (Reviewer

Re: RFR: 8305895: Implement JEP 450: Compact Object Headers (Experimental) [v15]

2024-09-24 Thread Roberto Castañeda Lozano
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:26:36 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote: >> I tried to reproduce for a few hours now using a custom testcase, with no >> success. >> I am pretty sure that this can happen, that is why I added this code. >> Originally I had an assert there asserting that index is not used. I do >>

Re: RFR: 8340363: Tag-specific default decorators for UnifiedLogging

2024-09-24 Thread Antón Seoane
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 09:03:55 GMT, Antón Seoane wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently, the Unified Logging framework defaults to three decorators > (uptime, level, tags) whenever the user does not specify otherwise through > `-Xlog`. This can result in cumbersome input whenever a specific user that >

Re: RFR: 8340657: [PPC64] SA determines wrong unextendedSP

2024-09-24 Thread Yasumasa Suenaga
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:15:27 GMT, Martin Doerr wrote: > Using the FP as raw_unextendedSP is wrong and causes problems like > [JDK-8339772](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339772). > "test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability" tests have passed with this PR. I'm not familiar with call frames on PPC

Re: RFR: 8340363: Tag-specific default decorators for UnifiedLogging

2024-09-24 Thread David Holmes
On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 07:19:21 GMT, Antón Seoane wrote: > I am not planning on changing the design idea of "decorators associated with > output device". This PR enables having defaults for -Xlog-selected tagsets, > but once the output device is configured we will end up with the same > decorator

Re: RFR: 8340363: Tag-specific default decorators for UnifiedLogging

2024-09-24 Thread Antón Seoane
On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 07:08:56 GMT, Roberto Castañeda Lozano wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Currently, the Unified Logging framework defaults to three decorators >> (uptime, level, tags) whenever the user does not specify otherwise through >> `-Xlog`. This can result in cumbersome input whenever a spe

Re: RFR: 8340363: Tag-specific default decorators for UnifiedLogging

2024-09-24 Thread Antón Seoane
On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 01:33:53 GMT, David Holmes wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Currently, the Unified Logging framework defaults to three decorators >> (uptime, level, tags) whenever the user does not specify otherwise through >> `-Xlog`. This can result in cumbersome input whenever a specific user th