On Sat, 2 Dec 2023 17:15:57 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> In the fix for the following bug:
>
> [JDK-8319935](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319935) Ensure only one
> JvmtiThreadState is created for one JavaThread associated with attached
> native thread
>
> JvmtiThreadState::state_
On Sat, 2 Dec 2023 17:15:57 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> In the fix for the following bug:
>
> [JDK-8319935](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319935) Ensure only one
> JvmtiThreadState is created for one JavaThread associated with attached
> native thread
>
> JvmtiThreadState::state_
> Please review this simple clarification to the JVM TI spec regarding use of
> `JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS` in regards to module options and their format.
>
> I do not believe this clarification needs a CSR request.
>
> Thanks.
David Holmes has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a m
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 08:42:35 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Please review this simple clarification to the JVM TI spec regarding use of
>> `JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS` in regards to module options and their format.
>>
>> I do not believe this clarification needs a CSR request.
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> src/hotspo
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 11:49:31 GMT, Jaroslav Bachorik
wrote:
>> Please, review this fix for a corner case handling of `jmethodID` values.
>>
>> The issue is related to the interplay between `jmethodID` values and method
>> redefinitions. Each `jmethodID` value is effectively a pointer to a `Meth