On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 03:41:28 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> Clean backport from mainline jdk repo to jdk21 for the fix of:
> [8311556](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8311556): GetThreadLocalStorage
> not working for vthreads mounted during JVMTI attach
>
> Testing:
> - TBD: mach5 tiers 1-5
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 03:41:28 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> Clean backport from mainline jdk repo to jdk21 for the fix of:
> [8311556](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8311556): GetThreadLocalStorage
> not working for vthreads mounted during JVMTI attach
>
> Testing:
> - TBD: mach5 tiers 1-5
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 19:18:38 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote:
> The change fixes handling of "suspended" bit in VT state.
> The code looks very strange.
> java_lang_VirtualThread::RUNNING == 3, so line 803 clears
> JVMTI_THREAD_STATE_ALIVE(1) and JVMTI_THREAD_STATE_TERMINATED(2)
> Per log this code came
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 03:41:28 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> Clean backport from mainline jdk repo to jdk21 for the fix of:
> [8311556](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8311556): GetThreadLocalStorage
> not working for vthreads mounted during JVMTI attach
>
> Testing:
> - TBD: mach5 tiers 1-5
On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 20:03:24 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
>> This is a continuation of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/10085. I
>> closed https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/10085 because it had accumulated
>> too much comment history and got confusing. For a history of this issue, see
>> pre
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 12:41:32 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this change which proposes to deprecate for
>> removal the `-Xdebug` option and `-debug` option of the `java` command?
>> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8227229.
>>
>> As noted in the JBS
Hi!
This is a minor HSDB fix. It prints "bad oop" instead of throwing an NPE
message to the console when a corrupted object is found.
-
Commit messages:
- 8312246: NPE when HSDB visits bad oop
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14922/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.o
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:34:38 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>> Fix a small leak in constant pool merging during retransformation of a
>> class. If this class has a catch block with `Throwable`, the class
>> `Throwable` is pre-resolved in the constant pool, while all the other
>> classes are in
> Fix a small leak in constant pool merging during retransformation of a class.
> If this class has a catch block with `Throwable`, the class `Throwable` is
> pre-resolved in the constant pool, while all the other classes are in a
> unresolved state. So the constant pool merging process was cons
> Fix a small leak in constant pool merging during retransformation of a class.
> If this class has a catch block with `Throwable`, the class `Throwable` is
> pre-resolved in the constant pool, while all the other classes are in a
> unresolved state. So the constant pool merging process was cons
> ### Motivation and proposal
> Hi, heap dump brings about pauses for application's execution(STW), this is a
> well-known pain. JDK-8252842 have added parallel support to heapdump in an
> attempt to alleviate this issue. However, all concurrent threads
> competitively write heap data to the sam
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 22:59:30 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> Approved, but please file that follow up issue.
Follow up issue for removing the dead code -
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8312232
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14855#issuecomment-1640234531
> Fix a small leak in constant pool merging during retransformation of a class.
> If this class has a catch block with `Throwable`, the class `Throwable` is
> pre-resolved in the constant pool, while all the other classes are in a
> unresolved state. So the constant pool merging process was cons
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 11:01:33 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> include -debug (alias) option in the deprecated log message
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/sun/launcher/resources/laun
> Can I please get a review of this change which proposes to deprecate for
> removal the `-Xdebug` option and `-debug` option of the `java` command? This
> addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8227229.
>
> As noted in the JBS issue this option is currently a no-op and has been there
>
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 07:58:58 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this change which proposes to deprecate for
>> removal the `-Xdebug` option and `-debug` option of the `java` command?
>> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8227229.
>>
>> As noted in the JBS
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 07:58:58 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this change which proposes to deprecate for
>> removal the `-Xdebug` option and `-debug` option of the `java` command?
>> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8227229.
>>
>> As noted in the JBS
> Can I please get a review of this change which proposes to deprecate for
> removal the `-Xdebug` option and `-debug` option of the `java` command? This
> addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8227229.
>
> As noted in the JBS issue this option is currently a no-op and has been there
>
> Can I please get a review of this change which proposes to deprecate for
> removal the `-Xdebug` option of the `java` command? This addresses
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8312151?
>
> As noted in the JBS issue this option is currently a no-op and has been there
> only for backward c
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 06:59:52 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change which proposes to deprecate for
> removal the `-Xdebug` option of the `java` command? This addresses
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8312151?
>
> As noted in the JBS issue this option is cur
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 06:59:52 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change which proposes to deprecate for
> removal the `-Xdebug` option of the `java` command? This addresses
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8312151?
>
> As noted in the JBS issue this option is cur
Can I please get a review of this change which proposes to deprecate for
removal the `-Xdebug` option of the `java` command? This addresses
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8312151?
As noted in the JBS issue this option is currently a no-op and has been there
only for backward compatible si
22 matches
Mail list logo
