On Sat, 3 Sep 2022 07:48:50 GMT, Dean Long wrote:
> Wouldn't the SA stack walk fail when attaching to a core dump from an earlier
> JVM that does not exclude nulls?
I'm not sure how important compatibility is with older JVMs. SA is capable of
(if properly maintained) connecting to any JVM. You
> Refactor code from inside of CompressedStream into its own unit.
>
> This code is likely to be used in future refactorings, such as JDK-8292818
> (replace 96-bit representation for field metadata with variable-sized
> streams).
>
> Add gtests.
John R Rose has updated the pull request increme
On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 18:49:27 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> While trying to find a fix for
> [JDK-8288429](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8288429) (no fix was
> found), I made some adjustments to the error handling in
> catch_mach_exception_raise() to make it a bit easier to understand the co
On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 18:49:27 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> While trying to find a fix for
> [JDK-8288429](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8288429) (no fix was
> found), I made some adjustments to the error handling in
> catch_mach_exception_raise() to make it a bit easier to understand the co
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 23:57:55 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> While dumping all registers (and doing a findpc on each), the following
> exception occurred for r8:
>
>
> r8: 0x00750e4fdffc
> Error: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 4099 out of bounds for
> length 4096
> java.lang
On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 03:20:56 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> While dumping all registers (and doing a findpc on each), the following
>> exception occurred for r8:
>>
>>
>> r8: 0x00750e4fdffc
>> Error: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 4099 out of bounds
>> for length 4096
>> ja
On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 20:33:37 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> This is an MR which partially reverts JDK-8289091 such that
>> JavaThread::threadObj() does not call Thread::current().
>>
>> A JVMTI operation could call threadObj() and clear the Windows GetLastError
>> value.
>>
>> Partial, because I
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 21:28:24 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote:
>> The problem is RedefineClasses does not update cached_class_bytes, so
>> subsequent RetransformClasses gets obsolete class bytes (this are testcases
>> 3-6 from the new test)
>>
>> cached_class_bytes are set when an agent instruments the
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 21:28:24 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote:
>> The problem is RedefineClasses does not update cached_class_bytes, so
>> subsequent RetransformClasses gets obsolete class bytes (this are testcases
>> 3-6 from the new test)
>>
>> cached_class_bytes are set when an agent instruments the
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 21:28:24 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote:
>> The problem is RedefineClasses does not update cached_class_bytes, so
>> subsequent RetransformClasses gets obsolete class bytes (this are testcases
>> 3-6 from the new test)
>>
>> cached_class_bytes are set when an agent instruments the
On Sat, 3 Sep 2022 00:52:56 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> The Loom related spec of the extension VirtualThreadMount and
> VirtualThreadUnmount events in the jvmti.xml is surrounded by the elements
> ` ... `, so these specs have to be ignored when the
> `jvmti.html `is generated. However the `j
On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 00:04:17 GMT, John R Rose wrote:
>> Refactor code from inside of CompressedStream into its own unit.
>>
>> This code is likely to be used in future refactorings, such as JDK-8292818
>> (replace 96-bit representation for field metadata with variable-sized
>> streams).
>>
>>
12 matches
Mail list logo
