Hi Sam,
I think these points are excellent. Up to now, we have provided software for
the public good without expecting anything in return, except to adhere to the
license terms.
But using our software does involve responsibilities that you have outlined
here.
Good job.
Craig
> On Jan 7,
In producing the written materials for the upcoming Security Summit at
the White House, it was very helpful that we had plenty of documentation
for our processes and procedures on the Apache web site. We document
what is expected of contributors, project management committees,
releases, respon
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 6:30 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/Position+Paper
The plan is to send this to the WH at 5PM Eastern (just under two
hours from now).
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe
Awesome work everyone! Just now I noticed an important key point that may
has slipped through:
Built into the "genes" of every project is that we (the ASF) make software
for the public good, at no charge and free to use for everyone.
--
Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happ
Very good work indeed (I followed it closely), thanks to all the participants.
Phil's remarks is right to the point!
Jacques
Le 07/01/2022 à 17:10, Phil Steitz a écrit :
This looks really good to me. Many thanks to those who contributed to the content. I have one comment that does not need to
Both sets of changes applied. Thanks!
- Sam Ruby
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 11:47 AM Dirk-Willem van Gulik
wrote:
>
> I would perhaps rephrase the section:
>
> The Apache Software Foundation is an example of an open source
> organization. Companies and invited experts collaborate there to
After testing this on a few very technical policy makers and asking them what
they read perhaps also change:L
- " those who use them" -> "companies that build these into their product"
- "JNDI (a part of the Java runtime library)" -> JNDI (a part of the Java
runtime; supplied its re
I would perhaps rephrase the section:
The Apache Software Foundation is an example of an open source
organization. Companies and invited experts collaborate there to produce
releases of software components and products. Along the way, those companies
and individuals contribute their i
This looks really good to me. Many thanks to those who contributed to
the content. I have one comment that does not need to be reflected in
the doc, but which may come up in discussion. I agree strongly with the
basic point that system owners need to take accountability for knowing
what they
Since the pre-meeting we've been updating the Position Paper (so if you've
not been 'watching' it on the wiki please take another look and comment
here). We're likely to submit this in the next few hours and it'll be sent
to all the delegates attending the meeting in advance. We've also been
info
10 matches
Mail list logo
