On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:35:01 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>>> But because of user privilege missing, the private key is not available and
>>> it shows as a certificate entry.
>>
>> You can have applications that need a certificate (public key) only e.g. to
>> verify signatures. This way you can use
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:41:15 GMT, Mat Carter wrote:
>> This fixes the defect described at
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>>
>> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
>> read-only (instead of failing).
>>
>> Please note that permissions to use a
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 23:55:50 GMT, Mat Carter wrote:
>> This fixes the defect described at
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>>
>> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
>> read-only (instead of failing).
>>
>> Please note that permissions to use a c
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:06:26 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
> This fixes the defect described at https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>
> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
> read-only (instead of failing).
>
> Please note that permissions to use a cert
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:53:23 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> This fixes the defect described at
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>>
>> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
>> read-only (instead of failing).
>>
>> Please note that permissions to use a
On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 21:54:02 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> When UAC is enabled and there is no privilege, I can see that some private
> key entries (Ex: the one for iis) become trusted certificate entries, which
> means their private key is not observable. Have you noticed something
> similar? Are
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:43:27 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> rebarbora-mckvak has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8313367: signHash looks for a key in either user or machine store
>
> The code change looks good to me. I think it's
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:04:06 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>>> But because of user privilege missing, the private key is not available and
>>> it shows as a certificate entry.
>>
>> You can have applications that need a certificate (public key) only e.g. to
>> verify signatures. This way you can use
