Re: RFR: 8281236: (D)TLS key exchange named groups [v2]

2022-08-09 Thread Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
> This update is to support key exchange named groups customization for > individual (D)TLS connection. Please review the CSR as well: > CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8291950 > RFE: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8281236 > Release-note: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8291975 >

Re: RFR: 8291949: Unexpected extending of SupportedGroups [v2]

2022-08-09 Thread Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
> In the SunJSSE implementation, there are a few unexpected extending of static > class SupportedGroups. It may be nice to clean them up so that the code is > easier to read. Please review this simple code clean up. Xue-Lei Andrew Fan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to

Re: [jdk19] RFR: 8290889: JDK 19 RDP2 L10n resource files update - msgdrop 10 [v4]

2022-08-09 Thread Alexey Semenyuk
On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 18:13:25 GMT, Alisen Chung wrote: >> open l10n msg drop >> All tests passed. > > Alisen Chung has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > added comments in CurrencyNames root in base, moved US CurrencyNames back > t

Post handshake client verification with TLSv1.3

2022-08-09 Thread Brad Wood
I have some questions about this ticket https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8206923 which was closed as "won't fix". I fully realize that TLS 1.3 forbids SSL renegotiation after the handshake in the traditional manner, but I'm curious if the process defined here can be used instead: https://www.op

[jdk19] Integrated: 8290889: JDK 19 RDP2 L10n resource files update - msgdrop 10

2022-08-09 Thread Alisen Chung
On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 03:03:25 GMT, Alisen Chung wrote: > open l10n msg drop > All tests passed. This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: 0def5316 Author:Alisen Chung Committer: Alexey Semenyuk URL: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk19/commit/0def5316cd2ec7699c649bf67bf58e6315c

Re: Post handshake client verification with TLSv1.3

2022-08-09 Thread Xuelei Fan
If we have a look from the viewpoint of HTTP/2, how applications could meet the requirements in HTTP/2? Did you have a plan to have the application works with HTTP/2 in the future? Xuelei > On Aug 9, 2022, at 12:29 PM, Brad Wood wrote: > > I have some questions about this ticket > https://