On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 17:28:21 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Bradford Wetmore has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Further codereview Comments from Weijun
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/javax/crypto/KEM.java line 68:
>
>> 66: *
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 22:33:46 GMT, Bradford Wetmore wrote:
>> The example code in the JEP was much clearer than that in the current `KEM`
>> class. It's easier to keep the various nested classes straight, rather than
>> using `var`s which require scrolling to see what the return types are.
>>
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 22:33:46 GMT, Bradford Wetmore wrote:
>> The example code in the JEP was much clearer than that in the current `KEM`
>> class. It's easier to keep the various nested classes straight, rather than
>> using `var`s which require scrolling to see what the return types are.
>>
> The example code in the JEP was much clearer than that in the current `KEM`
> class. It's easier to keep the various nested classes straight, rather than
> using `var`s which require scrolling to see what the return types are.
>
> Added/tweaked example for clarity.
>
> Generated/checked jav
> The example code in the JEP was much clearer than that in the current `KEM`
> class. It's easier to keep the various nested classes straight, rather than
> using `var`s which require scrolling to see what the return types are.
>
> Added/tweaked example for clarity.
>
> Generated/checked jav
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 14:28:04 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> The example code in the JEP was much clearer than that in the current `KEM`
>> class. It's easier to keep the various nested classes straight, rather than
>> using `var`s which require scrolling to see what the return types are.
>>
>> A
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 14:28:04 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> The example code in the JEP was much clearer than that in the current `KEM`
>> class. It's easier to keep the various nested classes straight, rather than
>> using `var`s which require scrolling to see what the return types are.
>>
>> A
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 05:02:44 GMT, Bradford Wetmore wrote:
> The example code in the JEP was much clearer than that in the current `KEM`
> class. It's easier to keep the various nested classes straight, rather than
> using `var`s which require scrolling to see what the return types are.
>
> A
