Re: RFR: 8348309: MultiNST tests need more debugging and timing [v2]

2025-03-08 Thread Sean Mullan
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:20:30 GMT, Anthony Scarpino wrote: >> I need a review of this change that adds new timing controls for the initial >> server setup. On rare occasions, more so on certain architectures, the >> server may not fully start before the client tries to connect. Additional >>

Re: RFR: 8348309: MultiNST tests need more debugging and timing [v2]

2025-02-21 Thread Hai-May Chao
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:20:30 GMT, Anthony Scarpino wrote: >> I need a review of this change that adds new timing controls for the initial >> server setup. On rare occasions, more so on certain architectures, the >> server may not fully start before the client tries to connect. Additional >>

Re: RFR: 8348309: MultiNST tests need more debugging and timing [v2]

2025-02-19 Thread Anthony Scarpino
> I need a review of this change that adds new timing controls for the initial > server setup. On rare occasions, more so on certain architectures, the > server may not fully start before the client tries to connect. Additional > debugging is added to help identify if there are other timing is

Re: RFR: 8348309: MultiNST tests need more debugging and timing

2025-02-18 Thread Anthony Scarpino
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:48:26 GMT, Matthew Donovan wrote: >> I need a review of this change that adds new timing controls for the initial >> server setup. On rare occasions, more so on certain architectures, the >> server may not fully start before the client tries to connect. Additional >> d

Re: RFR: 8348309: MultiNST tests need more debugging and timing

2025-02-18 Thread Anthony Scarpino
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 19:42:25 GMT, Anthony Scarpino wrote: >> test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/templates/TLSBase.java line 204: >> >>> 202: write(sock, read(sock)); >>> 203: } catch (Exception e) { >>> 204: System.err.println("Caught " + e.getMessage

Re: RFR: 8348309: MultiNST tests need more debugging and timing

2025-02-18 Thread Anthony Scarpino
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:38:50 GMT, Matthew Donovan wrote: >> I need a review of this change that adds new timing controls for the initial >> server setup. On rare occasions, more so on certain architectures, the >> server may not fully start before the client tries to connect. Additional >> d

Re: RFR: 8348309: MultiNST tests need more debugging and timing

2025-02-18 Thread Anthony Scarpino
On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 04:20:36 GMT, Anthony Scarpino wrote: > I need a review of this change that adds new timing controls for the initial > server setup. On rare occasions, more so on certain architectures, the > server may not fully start before the client tries to connect. Additional > debug

Re: RFR: 8348309: MultiNST tests need more debugging and timing

2025-02-18 Thread Anthony Scarpino
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 18:56:05 GMT, Hai-May Chao wrote: >> I need a review of this change that adds new timing controls for the initial >> server setup. On rare occasions, more so on certain architectures, the >> server may not fully start before the client tries to connect. Additional >> debug

Re: RFR: 8348309: MultiNST tests need more debugging and timing

2025-02-18 Thread Matthew Donovan
On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 04:20:36 GMT, Anthony Scarpino wrote: > I need a review of this change that adds new timing controls for the initial > server setup. On rare occasions, more so on certain architectures, the > server may not fully start before the client tries to connect. Additional > debug

Re: RFR: 8348309: MultiNST tests need more debugging and timing

2025-02-04 Thread Hai-May Chao
On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 04:20:36 GMT, Anthony Scarpino wrote: > I need a review of this change that adds new timing controls for the initial > server setup. On rare occasions, more so on certain architectures, the > server may not fully start before the client tries to connect. Additional > debug