> Currently these tests ignore vm flags, In most cases I've updated them to use
> `ProcessTools.createTestJavaProcessBuilder` this usually required some
> cleanup also.
>
> `test/jdk/java/net/ServerSocket/AcceptCauseFileDescriptorLeak.java` and
> `test/jdk/java/net/URLConnection/6212146/TestDri
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:27:52 GMT, Darragh Clarke wrote:
>> Currently these tests ignore vm flags, In most cases I've updated them to
>> use `ProcessTools.createTestJavaProcessBuilder` this usually required some
>> cleanup also.
>>
>> `test/jdk/java/net/ServerSocket/AcceptCauseFileDescriptorLea
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 11:38:07 GMT, Darragh Clarke wrote:
> Currently these tests ignore vm flags, In most cases I've updated them to use
> `ProcessTools.createTestJavaProcessBuilder` this usually required some
> cleanup also.
>
> `test/jdk/java/net/ServerSocket/AcceptCauseFileDescriptorLeak.java
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:44:10 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Hello Darragh, Daniel,
>>
>> As for introducing a new method on `ProcessTools` class, I don't know if
>> it's needed - I feel that the `ProcessTools` class is already getting too
>> complex because of the various similarly named methods.
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:04:27 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> That's not a bad idea. What I would recommend in that case would be to not
>> do anything here - but rather log another issue against
>> `ProcessTools.createTestJavaProcessBuilder`.
>> Then proceed with this PR without changing anything.
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 12:51:50 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Would it be possible to change the `createJavaProcessBuilder` method in
>> ProcessTools to include something to check if -cp is already an argument
>> being passed?
>>
>> maybe something like this?
>>
>>
>> if (!noCP && !args.contains(
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 11:38:07 GMT, Darragh Clarke wrote:
> Currently these tests ignore vm flags, In most cases I've updated them to use
> `ProcessTools.createTestJavaProcessBuilder` this usually required some
> cleanup also.
>
> `test/jdk/java/net/ServerSocket/AcceptCauseFileDescriptorLeak.java
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 11:38:07 GMT, Darragh Clarke wrote:
> Currently these tests ignore vm flags, In most cases I've updated them to use
> `ProcessTools.createTestJavaProcessBuilder` this usually required some
> cleanup also.
>
> `test/jdk/java/net/ServerSocket/AcceptCauseFileDescriptorLeak.java
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 11:38:07 GMT, Darragh Clarke wrote:
> Currently these tests ignore vm flags, In most cases I've updated them to use
> `ProcessTools.createTestJavaProcessBuilder` this usually required some
> cleanup also.
>
> `test/jdk/java/net/ServerSocket/AcceptCauseFileDescriptorLeak.java
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 10:58:45 GMT, Darragh Clarke wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/net/URLClassLoader/getresourceasstream/TestDriver.java line 63:
>>
>>> 61: ),
>>> 62: ProcessTools.createTestJavaProcessBuilder(
>>> 63: "-cp", ".",
>>
>> If I'm not
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 12:48:48 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Currently these tests ignore vm flags, In most cases I've updated them to
>> use `ProcessTools.createTestJavaProcessBuilder` this usually required some
>> cleanup also.
>>
>> `test/jdk/java/net/ServerSocket/AcceptCauseFileDescriptorLeak.j
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 11:38:07 GMT, Darragh Clarke wrote:
> Currently these tests ignore vm flags, In most cases I've updated them to use
> `ProcessTools.createTestJavaProcessBuilder` this usually required some
> cleanup also.
>
> `test/jdk/java/net/ServerSocket/AcceptCauseFileDescriptorLeak.java
12 matches
Mail list logo