> Add `getParams` to `PublicKey` and `PrivateKey` so it's available to all
> current and future public and private keys.
>
> No test. Might add one.
Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
AsymmetricKey
-
Change
On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 18:23:31 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> > Would `getParameterSpec` be a better/more descriptive name, given that the
> > thing it returns is an `AlgorithmParameterSpec`?
>
> >
>
> > (Disclosure: Our security library (WildFly Elytron) has a
> > `getParameterSpec` on every one o
On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 04:44:07 GMT, David M. Lloyd wrote:
> Would `getParameterSpec` be a better/more descriptive name, given that the
> thing it returns is an `AlgorithmParameterSpec`?
>
> (Disclosure: Our security library (WildFly Elytron) has a `getParameterSpec`
> on every one of its key imp
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 19:48:26 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> Add `getParams` to `PublicKey` and `PrivateKey` so it's available to all
>> current and future public and private keys.
>>
>> No test. Might add one.
>
> Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit
> Add `getParams` to `PublicKey` and `PrivateKey` so it's available to all
> current and future public and private keys.
>
> No test. Might add one.
Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
add spaces and code tags, and a test
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 15:30:03 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Add `getParams` to `PublicKey` and `PrivateKey` so it's available to all
> current and future public and private keys.
>
> No test. Might add one.
src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/PrivateKey.java line 86:
> 84: * The default