On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 17:12:05 GMT, Matthew Donovan wrote:
>> - Updated ProtocolVersion.isNegotiable() to check a bounded range of version
>> numbers.
>> - Removed IllegalRecordVersion.java from ProblemList.txt
>>
>> Tested with jdk_security and jdk_security3 test groups.
>
> Matthew Donovan has
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 22:46:06 GMT, Rajan Halade wrote:
>> Matthew Donovan has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> removed extra whitespace
>
> test/jdk/ProblemList.txt line 590:
>
>> 588:
>> 589: javax/net/ssl/SSLEngine/TestAllS
> - Updated ProtocolVersion.isNegotiable() to check a bounded range of version
> numbers.
> - Removed IllegalRecordVersion.java from ProblemList.txt
>
> Tested with jdk_security and jdk_security3 test groups.
Matthew Donovan has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit
> - Updated ProtocolVersion.isNegotiable() to check a bounded range of version
> numbers.
> - Removed IllegalRecordVersion.java from ProblemList.txt
>
> Tested with jdk_security and jdk_security3 test groups.
Matthew Donovan has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
commit
On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 00:28:32 GMT, Matthew Donovan wrote:
>> - Updated ProtocolVersion.isNegotiable() to check a bounded range of version
>> numbers.
>> - Removed IllegalRecordVersion.java from ProblemList.txt
>>
>> Tested with jdk_security and jdk_security3 test groups.
>
> Matthew Donovan has
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 15:32:23 GMT, Matthew Donovan wrote:
>> - Updated ProtocolVersion.isNegotiable() to check a bounded range of version
>> numbers.
>> - Removed IllegalRecordVersion.java from ProblemList.txt
>>
>> Tested with jdk_security and jdk_security3 test groups.
>
> Matthew Donovan has
> - Updated ProtocolVersion.isNegotiable() to check a bounded range of version
> numbers.
> - Removed IllegalRecordVersion.java from ProblemList.txt
>
> Tested with jdk_security and jdk_security3 test groups.
Matthew Donovan has updated the pull request incrementally with three
additional comm
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:49:14 GMT, Matthew Donovan wrote:
> > > If we need to support later, currently undefined, versions then is
> > > IllegalRecordVersion a valid test?
> > > That's the good question. It may worthy of further evaluation and the
> > > test case could be removed if it is not va
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 20:34:49 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
> > If we need to support later, currently undefined, versions then is
> > IllegalRecordVersion a valid test?
> That's the good question. It may worthy of further evaluation and the test
> case could be removed if it is not valid.
I r
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 18:59:30 GMT, Matthew Donovan wrote:
> - Updated ProtocolVersion.isNegotiable() to check a bounded range of version
> numbers.
> - Removed IllegalRecordVersion.java from ProblemList.txt
>
> Tested with jdk_security and jdk_security3 test groups.
test/jdk/ProblemList.txt li
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 20:16:02 GMT, Matthew Donovan wrote:
> > This update will introduce version negotiation issues. Per TLS spec,
> > version 105.106 should be allowed and the version could be negotiated
> > properly. When TLS 1.4 is defined later in the future, the code update here
> > will c
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 19:25:32 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
> This update will introduce version negotiation issues. Per TLS spec, version
> 105.106 should be allowed and the version could be negotiated properly. When
> TLS 1.4 is defined later in the future, the code update here will cause
>
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 18:59:30 GMT, Matthew Donovan wrote:
> - Updated ProtocolVersion.isNegotiable() to check a bounded range of version
> numbers.
> - Removed IllegalRecordVersion.java from ProblemList.txt
>
> Tested with jdk_security and jdk_security3 test groups.
This update will introduce
13 matches
Mail list logo
