On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:05:07 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
> The test is failing currently and the JBS issue could not be resolved since
> about a month, so let's exclude the test for now.
Withdrawing in favor of #19814
([JDK-8334441](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8334441)).
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 15:57:31 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> What is the point of stalling this PR? The test causes test errors, so it
> should be problemlisted. And if https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8331883
> is urgent, it should be worked on with high priority. But surely there is no
> need
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:05:07 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
> The test is failing currently and the JBS issue could not be resolved since
> about a month, so let's exclude the test for now.
What is the point of stalling this PR? The test causes test errors, so it
should be problemlisted. And if
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:05:07 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
> The test is failing currently and the JBS issue could not be resolved since
> about a month, so let's exclude the test for now.
Any updates? If not, I would like to integrate this after end of this week...
-
PR Comment: h
On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 07:47:19 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
> @rhalade could you please bless this exclusion now since it pops up in tests
> of all our codelines every day...
Drawing parallel with other reviews for this test and the pending discussion,
we should hold on this PR for now. I will r
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:05:07 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
> The test is failing currently and the JBS issue could not be resolved since
> about a month, so let's exclude the test for now.
@rhalade could you please bless this exclusion now since it pops up in tests of
all our codelines every da
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:55:34 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> Please wait for @rhalade to review.
Will do. There's also #19685 and #19690. These are somewhat annoying and I'd
prefer if we could exclude them for the time being.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19689#issuecom
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:05:07 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
> The test is failing currently and the JBS issue could not be resolved since
> about a month, so let's exclude the test for now.
Please wait for @rhalade to review.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19689#issu
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:05:07 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
> The test is failing currently and the JBS issue could not be resolved since
> about a month, so let's exclude the test for now.
+1
-
Marked as reviewed by stuefe (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19
The test is failing currently and the JBS issue could not be resolved since
about a month, so let's exclude the test for now.
-
Commit messages:
- JDK-8334201
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19689/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=19689&range=00
I
10 matches
Mail list logo